Comments on: Stupak now target of all sides in abortion debate http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/ Religion, faith and ethics Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:25:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: dadders http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23956 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:11:52 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23956 To put in easy words .. how can a human being be so evil to destroy unborn Americans and adult Americans for Money and position. He had a chance to make American history as one who stood up for the right to life liberty and happiness.. Would he kill his own children or put them in the place to have to depend on Gov. health care. I will never in the remainder of my Life vote Dem. again.

]]>
By: free4me http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23952 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:06:48 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23952 45 years of woman’s rights down the toilet. As a man I marched & supported the right of woman to choose. The Supreme court agreed & we got Roe V Wade. Now in this age of enlightonment we go back to COAT HANGER MEDICINE.What are poor or just woman who made a mistake & got pregnant to do. The rich can pay or just take a long weekend to Puerto Rico or London,(yes,that’s where woman with money used to go)The poor just went to abortion (doctors)with a coat hanger & took there chances. Congrats to the right wing or did I read it wrong & they will be willing to adopt all those upcoming unwanted births?

]]>
By: RufusDaddy http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23950 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:23:01 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23950 I have to agree with Streetfighter; by denying healthcare to 29 million Men, Women, and Children in America this makes Randy Neugebauer a true high volume baby killer. Way to go Randy! You must really hate people to be against this bill. Instead of helping millions you would rather pocket a few extra dollars each pay check. Loser!

]]>
By: Benny_Acosta http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23948 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:34:40 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23948 Abortion is a very personal issue. And even if it doesn’t fit in morally with one person’s beliefs, making the option safe and above board removes a whole host of problems. Just like drinking and living a fast life, the only way to change is by way of understanding.

A woman who does not want her pregnancy and chooses to have an abortion should not be condemned. She should be given other options that allow for the life of the child to be spared while relieving her of the burden of parenthood. Will attempting to shame these women be of any real use? No. It only alienates them. When a person has a tough choice to make, they aren’t very likely to listen to people who chastise them. But if you have a solution or are offering help of some kind, your words will be welcome.

]]>
By: jeball53 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23947 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:15:01 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23947 Just a side show circus act by yet another Demon Cat.

]]>
By: Anna123 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23946 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:40:39 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23946 I think abortion was just a lame excuse that both parties used.
Neither party cares who lives or dies-only how much money they can line their pockets with.
I guess he must have a girlfriend or something in his past-he looks like he was not bribed but threatened.

]]>
By: neahkahnie http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23945 Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:39:42 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23945 Bart Stupak is a solid American believeing that all Americans deserve health care. He hasn’t given up his beliefs. Woe be to those who would chastise him. He will go down in history as a brave, courageous and great American.

]]>
By: dennisaa http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23944 Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:00:11 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23944 As far as the Health Care Bill, it passed so no need to discuss history.

He gets what he deserves. He should have keep his mouth shut.

At least he had an opinion which Republicans seems to lack. They vote in a block as a group. No individualism there.

]]>
By: jhurt http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23943 Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:28:20 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23943 @AmandaT Actually Stupak put himself to shame by those comments. For him to “oppose” the bill, and make such a show of not supporting it because of his “belief in the sanctity of life,” then to flip and support it after a promise of an executive order (which has absolutely NO value or merit under the law)is absolutely vile. His comments were a complete 180 from his prior stance which rightfully beg the question, “Does he REALLY care about the “sanctity of life”?

I would argue his opposition was the true politicizing of life and that was the issue he held onto hoping to get something more from the deal. Isn’t it ironic that the day before he changed his vote from “no” to “yes” that his district was awarded two airports and several hundred thousand dollars in stimulus money for various projects?

I imagine that is purely coincidental and that the payoff had absolutely nothing to do with him changing his “values” and choosing to support this bill. Either support it or not, but don’t dare claim that the promise of an executive order was the icing on the cake and then turn around and make the comments he did on the floor of the House. Read the transcript of his speech, utterly reprehensible considering his prior stance and “commitment”.

]]>
By: liberated http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/22/stupak-now-target-of-all-sides-in-abortion-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23942 Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:15:18 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=12577#comment-23942 What are they blathering about when it comes to abortion. No one is required to have an abortion! It’s there for those who feel they have a right to choose! Believe
what you believe and let us do the same. Stop whining!

]]>