<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vatican talks with SSPX splinter group proving difficult &#8211; cardinal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/05/06/vatican-talks-with-sspx-splinter-group-proving-difficult-cardinal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/05/06/vatican-talks-with-sspx-splinter-group-proving-difficult-cardinal/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jpjacks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/05/06/vatican-talks-with-sspx-splinter-group-proving-difficult-cardinal/comment-page-1/#comment-24592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jpjacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=13248#comment-24592</guid>
		<description>The use of the word petrified by Cardinal Kasper is unfair. Vatican II was pastoral not dogamatic. If Cardinal Kasper wants Catholics to accept new traditions, then maybe another dogamatic council should be held! 

Influential Cardinals calling SSPX &#039;the traditionalists&#039; is decisive. Are we not the One, Holy, Catholic, &amp; Apostolic? The ancient Christian Church, who use to possess a universal liturgy 1,500 years old that contains living organic developments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of the word petrified by Cardinal Kasper is unfair. Vatican II was pastoral not dogamatic. If Cardinal Kasper wants Catholics to accept new traditions, then maybe another dogamatic council should be held! </p>
<p>Influential Cardinals calling SSPX &#8216;the traditionalists&#8217; is decisive. Are we not the One, Holy, Catholic, &amp; Apostolic? The ancient Christian Church, who use to possess a universal liturgy 1,500 years old that contains living organic developments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alforo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/05/06/vatican-talks-with-sspx-splinter-group-proving-difficult-cardinal/comment-page-1/#comment-24235</link>
		<dc:creator>alforo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=13248#comment-24235</guid>
		<description>Well, since you put it that way and gave us a choice, I prefer the p;etrified version over the living traditional one anyday after I have seen what the living tradition has become.[[

I don&#039;t think I really understand what a living tradition is. Isn&#039;t that sort of a contradiction in terms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since you put it that way and gave us a choice, I prefer the p;etrified version over the living traditional one anyday after I have seen what the living tradition has become.[[</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I really understand what a living tradition is. Isn&#8217;t that sort of a contradiction in terms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
