Comments on: GUESTVIEW: No good deed goes unpunished Religion, faith and ethics Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:25:07 +0000 hourly 1 By: SteveMD2 Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:29:56 +0000 objective depravity. This is what the church calls part of God’s creation – the gays.

No wonder they are driven to suicide, and sometimes murdered. by the church of “life”

The whole world is changing. Fancy words, and ideas from an age of the ‘anything but’ holy roman empire cannot change the fact that gay people are more and more being accepted as the good people they are. While the church in Europe is dying quickly, and splitting here.

And btw, the two states with the lowest divorce rate in the USA are Mass and Conn. Two of the first states with gay marriage.

And lets not forget that the church has yet to EXcommunicate Hitler. Born and Baptised a catholic in very Catholic Austria. Where he learned his hatred of the Jews – Jesus own people- from the poison the church put into society over a millenia. And it was this hatred that hitler leveraged to get elected. And 50 million people died.

And in 2009, RATZInger UNexcommunicated a Bishop Williamson, who is a holocaust denier / minimizer. To bring Williamson’s 600,000 mad followers back into the church.

At least Argentina had the you know whats to throw Williamson out of the ocuntry. And just recently their legislature passed a gay marriage bill.

I used to think that Ratzinger was a hitler in disguise. Now I believe he is part of Gods plan to help change, or destroy, the church that has always needed some victim to hate, to sell their corrupt brand of love.

The catholic church is, as we’ve seen in endless revelations of the cover up of sexual (and mental) abuse of children, like a Pathological liar. So corrupt that it cant possibly even understand its own corruptness.

it fits perfectly the definition of Power: Power corrupts,and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And when you claim to speak for God, it gets just that much more worse.

By: telmab7 Tue, 18 May 2010 22:53:10 +0000 Mankind was created by Our All Powerful Triune God to worship Him and serve Him. On the views above I would say as God begins to separate the sheep and the goat there are only two world views. Pagan and Judao-Christian The only purpose two people are together with one another is to give birth to and raise Christian children to in keeping with the first order of Genesis. This life has very little to do with this world and the word used above “eudaimonistic” which is a pagan pleasure and happiness. Those that cannot see that the culture of death is abortion, euthanasia, and gay unions need to go back to their international world history, their theology and scripture. In Romans 1:24-26 it says two people “of the same sex together” are an abomination under God. Children being sacrificed -gay sex- and pushing out the old IS A POLYTHEISM – It’s idolatry, the worship of false Gods~! If Our God Jesus Christ would turn over the tables for merchandise sales in the foyers of the Church what do you think he will do to those selling this corrupt view in His house.
As the Protestants begin to go completely false liberal it is “we” Jesus’ orthodox remnant that is set aside to tell of Him and His way and His way gets narrower and narrower not broader and broader. Read His inerrant Word it will tell us Salvation history and Salvation future !

By: dude123 Fri, 14 May 2010 20:12:04 +0000 These are simple questions Tom, and Fr. Fessio. Take the first one. There can only be a handful of “views” on the issue of divorce, e.g. people who remarry after divorce commit adultery, people in a state of sin desecrate the Eucharist if they receive, adultery is a mortal sin, if you die unrepentant, you will burn in hell. Which one of these “VIEWS” does the Church need to reconsider Tom? The second question is just as simple. I won’t bore these intelligent readers any further.

By: dude123 Fri, 14 May 2010 02:06:26 +0000 Repeat, follow closely:
What ***VIEW*** about adulterers does the Church need to reconsider???

***WHY*** does the Church need to reconsider the “quality” of sodomite relationships???

By: Tom Heneghan Thu, 13 May 2010 12:47:30 +0000 dude123, you say Schoenborn gave no reasons for his comments about changing the Church’s approach to remarried divorced people and to homosexuals. That’s not true.

On the first issue, he said “Many people don’t even get married anymore so we need a new way to appreciate those who through marriage publicly pledge themselves to each other.” On the second, he said: “A stable relationship is certainly better than if someone chooses to be promiscuous.”

As Fr. Fessio notes above, “he explained that it is important to avoid the errors of a Kantian moral philosophy, that is, one based on the categorical imperative of duty alone. Thomas Aquinas, inspired by Aristotle, elaborated what scholars would call a eudaimonistic rather than a deontological moral philosophy. That is, a moral philosophy not based on mere duty, but based on the natural desire of all men for happiness.”

You may not agree with Schoenborn’s explanation but you can’t say he didn’t offer one.

By: dude123 Wed, 12 May 2010 18:33:52 +0000 What “VIEW” of remarried divorcees (adulterers) does Schonborn say the Church should “reconsider”? Silence.

WHY should the Church give consideration to the “quality” of sodomite relationships? No reason given.