FaithWorld

Merkel cites Christian roots as Berlin resumes Muslim dialogue

May 17, 2010
merkel

Chancellor Angela Merkel at the Ecumenical Church Congress in Munich on May 14, 2010/Michaela Rehle

Chancellor Angela Merkel has told Germany’s Ecumenical Church Congress (Kirchentag) in Munich that Christianity is a main foundation of the country’s values system. This is not a surprising statement in Germany, especially for the leader of a party called the Christian Democratic Union. But it’s not one that’s heard much in some other European countries, either because of a strict separation of church and state (like France with its la√Įcit√©) or some multicultural model (as in Britain) that plays down the majority religious heritage of European societies.

One concern about stressing the historical contribution of Christianity to European values is that this could amount to slighting other faiths, especially Islam. But Kirchentag comments by Merkel and her interior minister, Thomas de Maizière, point in a different direction.

Vatican Radio’s German service highlighted Merkel’s comments on Christianity (with an audio clip in German), which were not in the prepared text and got almost no coverage elsewhere:

“Our society lives on premises that it cannot create by itself. Without a doubt, one of these very important premises is Christianity. Christianity has shaped our country … I’m not saying we could not have arrived where we are in any other way, but here in Germany it’s very clear that we came to our values system through Christianity. That means we know that freedom does not mean freedom from something, but it means freedom given by God through His Creation to commit oneself to help others and stand up for causes. This may be the most important source of social cohesion.”

This argument — especially its first sentence — is based on a quote from the German legal philosopher Ernst-Wolfgang B√∂ckenf√∂rde:¬† ‚ÄúThe liberal secular state lives on premises that it cannot itself guarantee.‚ÄĚ This view played a central role in the unexpectedly harmonious 2004 dialogue between then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and German philosopher J√ľrgen Habermas, where both the future pope and the former leftist agreed that religion created an ethical basis that modern societies — even secular societies — depended on to operate.

maiziere

Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere in parliament in Berlin on January 19, 2010/Tobias Schwarz

This does not mean Merkel’s government takes a narrow and exclusive view of religion. Interior Minister Thomas de Maizi√®re wrote a guest column for Bild am Sonntag after participating in the Kirchentag himself. Starting with praise for the dialogue over confessional boundaries he saw there,¬† de Maizi√®re said:

“During these days in Munich, I asked myself how long we still need before we can arrange an event like this with Islam? Following Martin Luther King’s motto ‘I have a dream,’ I wish we could have joint festivals, controversial¬† debates and engaging discussions with Islam and within Islam.”

The interior minister said this was the aim of the German Islam Conference, a dialogue between the government and the country’s seven main Muslim organisations begun in 2006. But one of those groups, the Central Council of Muslims, is boycotting the meeting today, which de Maizi√®re said would discuss “Islamic religious education, training of religion teachers and the border between welcome Islam and the unwelcome Islamism.”

It will be interesting to see whether de Maizière can eventually come to some kind of understanding with Muslims similar to what Merkel showed with Christians. The Ratzinger-Habermas dialogue could point to ways to reach it.

Follow FaithWorld on Twitter at RTRFaithWorld


Comments
One comment so far | RSS Comments RSS

until and only when does Islam become a truly free religion where joining or leaving is an option, and the ability to ask questions of the faith is accepted should they be recognised as a true religion not a caste sytem with truly horrifying retributions. Koran or not, a death penalty passed by an ecclesiastical court with no recognised authority, that is considered to be accountable outside the country where any such penalty is passed, and can be carried out by any means at any time is barbarian.

Posted by pugwash | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/