<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell and abortion at U.S. military bases&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/12/10/dont-ask-dont-tell-and-abortion-at-u-s-military-bases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/12/10/dont-ask-dont-tell-and-abortion-at-u-s-military-bases/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GL333</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/12/10/dont-ask-dont-tell-and-abortion-at-u-s-military-bases/comment-page-1/#comment-28049</link>
		<dc:creator>GL333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=18650#comment-28049</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s not entirely clear, at least to me, that the legislation would have channeled tax-payer dollars to fund abortions at military bases or not.&quot;

You are supposed to be a journalist. Read the text of the bill.  Clearly this bill would NOT channel tax-payer dollars to fund abortions. The claim to the contrary is a cynical ploy taking advantage of the fact that no average person will read the bill.

You are a journalist. &quot;Oh well, maybe it&#039;s true and maybe it isn&#039;t&quot; is not journalism, it&#039;s a sad cop-out. Tell the truth and report the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s not entirely clear, at least to me, that the legislation would have channeled tax-payer dollars to fund abortions at military bases or not.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are supposed to be a journalist. Read the text of the bill.  Clearly this bill would NOT channel tax-payer dollars to fund abortions. The claim to the contrary is a cynical ploy taking advantage of the fact that no average person will read the bill.</p>
<p>You are a journalist. &#8220;Oh well, maybe it&#8217;s true and maybe it isn&#8217;t&#8221; is not journalism, it&#8217;s a sad cop-out. Tell the truth and report the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
