<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dutch may introduce burqa ban as early as 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/12/16/dutch-may-introduce-burqa-ban-as-early-as-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/12/16/dutch-may-introduce-burqa-ban-as-early-as-2011/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:44:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/12/16/dutch-may-introduce-burqa-ban-as-early-as-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-28185</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=18873#comment-28185</guid>
		<description>One might argue that this burqa ban is long overdue and that this outfit symbolises non-interaction, non-integration and distance.  One must find it impossible to start an introduction to someone whose eyes are hardly visible and if the eyes are visible it&#039;s the outfit that stifles any introduction let alone conversation and friendship.  This is precisely what some old gentleman used to say from years ago; &#039;it&#039;s not the West one should watch out for; they won&#039;t take your land and freedom ... but it is Islam, a political and religious stand which is altogether different from what everyone had known that one should worry about&#039;.  And now it seems Geert Wilders must have seen the light, so to speak for no one like him have said that Islam is &#039;incompatible with freedom of discussion and speech&#039; even though politicians are witnessing and seeing the obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One might argue that this burqa ban is long overdue and that this outfit symbolises non-interaction, non-integration and distance.  One must find it impossible to start an introduction to someone whose eyes are hardly visible and if the eyes are visible it&#8217;s the outfit that stifles any introduction let alone conversation and friendship.  This is precisely what some old gentleman used to say from years ago; &#8216;it&#8217;s not the West one should watch out for; they won&#8217;t take your land and freedom &#8230; but it is Islam, a political and religious stand which is altogether different from what everyone had known that one should worry about&#8217;.  And now it seems Geert Wilders must have seen the light, so to speak for no one like him have said that Islam is &#8216;incompatible with freedom of discussion and speech&#8217; even though politicians are witnessing and seeing the obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
