Comments on: A non-prophet organization? A reader objects to “Prophet Mohammad” http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/01/20/a-non-prophet-organization-a-reader-objects-to-prophet-mohammad/ Religion, faith and ethics Mon, 20 May 2013 03:25:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: DromedaryHump http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/01/20/a-non-prophet-organization-a-reader-objects-to-prophet-mohammad/comment-page-1/#comment-28971 DromedaryHump Sat, 22 Jan 2011 01:23:55 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=19247#comment-28971 I know just how the complaining Christian feels. As an atheist everytime I see you guys use the term "Jesus Christ" I get annoyed. He's no "christ" (aka "annointed one") to me! So from now on I demand you use the term "Jesus of Nazareth the Christian's supposed christ." Thank you. I know just how the complaining Christian feels.

As an atheist everytime I see you guys use the term “Jesus Christ” I get annoyed. He’s no “christ” (aka “annointed one”) to me!

So from now on I demand you use the term “Jesus of Nazareth the Christian’s supposed christ.”

Thank you.

]]> By: chrono http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/01/20/a-non-prophet-organization-a-reader-objects-to-prophet-mohammad/comment-page-1/#comment-28938 chrono Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:51:12 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=19247#comment-28938 It would be best not to "use official titles and honorifics that are common in the faith concerned" especially considering the fact that they aren't necessarly "widely understood across religious boundaries". It would be best not to “use official titles and honorifics that are common in the faith concerned” especially considering the fact that they aren’t necessarly “widely understood across religious boundaries”.

]]>