<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vatican tells U.N. that critics of gays under attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/03/22/vatican-tells-u-n-that-critics-of-gays-under-attack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/03/22/vatican-tells-u-n-that-critics-of-gays-under-attack/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: edithmaud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/03/22/vatican-tells-u-n-that-critics-of-gays-under-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-30237</link>
		<dc:creator>edithmaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=20390#comment-30237</guid>
		<description>It appears to me that the Vatican has put itself in a difficult positoon. If it insists that pedophiles are gay, and continues to discover pedophiles in the priesthood - qite a few of them, then it must be hiring gay priests. Maybe there is a test for gayness they can administer. However since there is no evidence whatsoever that pedophiles are gay, they might do better to take a look at their own organisation before blaming homosexuals who are no different in their range of behaviours than any other group - and the vatican ought to know that pedophilia is more about power and inability to relate to one&#039;s peers sexually than it is about homo- or heterosexuality. As to abusive behaviour - well who better to recognise that than the vatican?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears to me that the Vatican has put itself in a difficult positoon. If it insists that pedophiles are gay, and continues to discover pedophiles in the priesthood &#8211; qite a few of them, then it must be hiring gay priests. Maybe there is a test for gayness they can administer. However since there is no evidence whatsoever that pedophiles are gay, they might do better to take a look at their own organisation before blaming homosexuals who are no different in their range of behaviours than any other group &#8211; and the vatican ought to know that pedophilia is more about power and inability to relate to one&#8217;s peers sexually than it is about homo- or heterosexuality. As to abusive behaviour &#8211; well who better to recognise that than the vatican?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mildred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/03/22/vatican-tells-u-n-that-critics-of-gays-under-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-30141</link>
		<dc:creator>mildred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=20390#comment-30141</guid>
		<description>Really? Violations of their fundamental rights? What about the fundamental rights of gays to marry, or adopt children. What about their rights against discrimination? He says there&#039;s a consensus between societies to certain kinds of sexual behavior that must be forbidden by law including pedophilia and incest. What a feeble  attempt to demonize gays by associating these crimes as if they&#039;re the ones committing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Violations of their fundamental rights? What about the fundamental rights of gays to marry, or adopt children. What about their rights against discrimination? He says there&#8217;s a consensus between societies to certain kinds of sexual behavior that must be forbidden by law including pedophilia and incest. What a feeble  attempt to demonize gays by associating these crimes as if they&#8217;re the ones committing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3bladerunner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/03/22/vatican-tells-u-n-that-critics-of-gays-under-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-30117</link>
		<dc:creator>3bladerunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=20390#comment-30117</guid>
		<description>If that isn&#039;t the biggest bag of BS, I don&#039;t know what is. The Vatican and the Catholic church are playing the victims now? The real victims are molested children, women AND gays. I would love to know Who has prosecuted and why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that isn&#8217;t the biggest bag of BS, I don&#8217;t know what is. The Vatican and the Catholic church are playing the victims now? The real victims are molested children, women AND gays. I would love to know Who has prosecuted and why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott-K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/03/22/vatican-tells-u-n-that-critics-of-gays-under-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-30096</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott-K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=20390#comment-30096</guid>
		<description>People are being &quot;attacked&quot; for expressing anti-gay sentiments?  Seriously?  Does calling someone a bigot qualify as an &quot;attack&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are being &#8220;attacked&#8221; for expressing anti-gay sentiments?  Seriously?  Does calling someone a bigot qualify as an &#8220;attack&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
