<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China says everything normal at restive Tibetan temple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/04/20/china-says-everything-normal-at-restive-tibetan-temple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/04/20/china-says-everything-normal-at-restive-tibetan-temple/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:22:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoffK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/04/20/china-says-everything-normal-at-restive-tibetan-temple/comment-page-1/#comment-30450</link>
		<dc:creator>geoffK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 05:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=20814#comment-30450</guid>
		<description>Dear Reuters, 
While you have not written anything here that is incorrect, you mislead through your omission! You have reported what the Chinese Government has stated. However, you have omitted investigating or verifying if it is true (which many know it is not accurate).
Reporting misleading information as a &quot;quote&quot; from unreliable speakers is exactly what the chinese government wants. You did exactly what they wanted and are misleading your readers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Reuters,<br />
While you have not written anything here that is incorrect, you mislead through your omission! You have reported what the Chinese Government has stated. However, you have omitted investigating or verifying if it is true (which many know it is not accurate).<br />
Reporting misleading information as a &#8220;quote&#8221; from unreliable speakers is exactly what the chinese government wants. You did exactly what they wanted and are misleading your readers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
