FaithWorld

China rejects U.N. claim on Tibetan monks’ disapperance

By Reuters Staff
June 9, 2011

(Tibetan monks walk at Drepung Monastery in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, July 19, 2009/Grace Liang )

China on Thursday defended its treatment of Tibetan monks it says are undergoing re-education, responding to a U.N. inquiry about what exiled Tibetans have called the forced disappearance of hundreds of monks.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said the monks had not been detained illegally, and urged U.N. human rights investigators to act without prejudice. “It is legal to supervise religious affairs, and protect normal religious order. This issue of forced disappearance fundamentally does not exist,” Hong told reporters at a regular press briefing.

U.N. human rights investigators called on China to reveal the “fate and whereabouts” of more than 300 monks who disappeared after being rounded up by security forces at a monastery in Aba prefecture of the southwestern province of Sichuan in April.

Exiled Tibetans and a prominent writer have said that the crackdown was sparked by a monk’s self-immolation in March, an apparent protest against government controls.

Read the full story by Michael Martina here. For more background, see Chinese forces detain 300 Tibetan Buddhist monks for a month – sources

.

Follow FaithWorld on Twitter at RTRFaithWorld

rss buttonSubscribe to all posts via RSS

Comments
One comment so far | RSS Comments RSS

The only thing the lamas/monks are doing while receiving government stipend is ‘preserve’ the Tibat culture. To become more ‘productive’, they protest Chinese government’s ‘cultural genocide’. These lamas need to be put to work, to produce something useful to themselves and to others.

Posted by blinded1 | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/