Comments on: U.S. Supreme Court clears way for California to remove large cross http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2012/06/27/u-s-supreme-court-clears-way-for-california-to-remove-large-cross/ Religion, faith and ethics Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:25:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: posthu http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2012/06/27/u-s-supreme-court-clears-way-for-california-to-remove-large-cross/comment-page-1/#comment-44066 Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:25:16 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=25998#comment-44066 taking it down would be restricting the free exercise of religion! how we’ve gone from “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” to “Congress shall allow no religious expression whatsoever on public land” remains a mystery.

Shall we bulldoze all the tombstones in Arlington too? Have we considered that this misinterpretive anti-religious expression meme amounts to government endorsement of atheism, humanism or agnosticism? Let the 1st Amendment read as it is written – it is freedom of religion, not freedom from such.

]]>
By: nikaraci http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2012/06/27/u-s-supreme-court-clears-way-for-california-to-remove-large-cross/comment-page-1/#comment-43727 Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:51:11 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=25998#comment-43727 yeah while you are at it, lets take down EVERYTHING with historical value… dont you realize that EVERYTHING has religious significance….the missions along the pacific coastline… many museums… many government buildings…. but because of historical value, they wont be knocked down… this country has gotten so afraid of offending ppl that we are tearing down the very foundation of what made this country so great to begin with…

]]>
By: arttie http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2012/06/27/u-s-supreme-court-clears-way-for-california-to-remove-large-cross/comment-page-1/#comment-42750 Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:28:17 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=25998#comment-42750 Take it down. It clearly is a violation of the separation of church and state since it is on public land.

]]>