Libya’s first post-Gaddafi vote to test Islamists

July 5, 2012

(Al Watan Islamist party candidate Radya Abu Rawee Muhamed Al Wareemi smiles during an election campaign rally in Tripoli July 2, 2012. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra)

In a small hotel in central Tripoli, about 50 first-time political candidates from across the country are learning how to project the Islamic message of their new party ahead of Libya’s first election in a generation on Saturday.

“You will be asked about how we view women in the party and what our relationship with Abdul Hakim Belhadj is,” says Ismail al-Greitly, a campaign coordinator for al-Watan, referring to a one-time Islamic militant who has swapped his trademark military fatigues for sharp suits and the slick campaigning of democracy.

After the popular uprisings of 2011 ousted dictators in Tunisia and Egypt, democratic elections there ushered in parliaments dominated by long-suppressed Islamist groups. On July 7, Libya, which overthrew Muammar Gaddafi in a bloody NATO-backed rebellion, will determine whether political Islam continues its post-Arab Spring rise.

With political parties banned even before Gaddafi seized power in 1969, Libyans have precious little experience of anything resembling democracy.

“There is no political language in Libya. There is no language for democracy or any level of political sophistication,” said Mary Fitzgerald, a journalist who is researching Libyan Islamists for a forthcoming book.

“When a population like this is experiencing elections for the first time, candidates use language that resonates with voters. In this case that means language relating to religion, tradition and culture.”

Read the full story by Hadeel Al Shalchi here.
Follow RTRFaithWorld via Twitter Follow all posts on Twitter @ RTRFaithWorld

rss button Follow all posts via RSS

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see