Egypt’s constitutional reform talks stumble over the role of Islam in the law

September 12, 2012

(Abd Elrahman Elbar (L) and Saeed Abd Elazeem (2nd L), members of the committee drafting Egypt’s new constitution, speak at the Shura Council in Cairo September 11, 2012. REUTERS/Mohamed Abd El Ghany)

A proposal by ultraconservative Salafis to give Egypt’s main Islamic institution the final say on whether the law of the land adheres to Islamic laws threatens to bring the already painfully slow process of drafting the new constitution to a grinding halt.

The proposal would give the revered Al-Azhar power similar to a supreme court by making it the arbiter of whether a law conforms with the principles of sharia, already cited in the constitution of ousted leader Hosni Mubarak as Egypt’s “main source” of legislation.

Opponents say the move would only exacerbate Egypt’s volatile politics and make it harder to heal social tensions in a country where one tenth of the population is Christian.

The argument is also diverting energy away from other essential points of law – the balance of power between president and parliament, the influence of the army, defense of personal freedoms and an independent judiciary.

“Lack of trust is so deep-seated now in Egypt,” said Shadi Hamid, a political analyst at the Brookings Doha Center. “Anything in the constitution will be interpreted through this lens of mistrust.”

A constitutional assembly of 100 thinkers, scholars, professionals and political and religious leaders dominated by Islamists is drawing up the constitution, without which the country cannot hold elections to replace a parliament that a court declared void in June.

Read the full story by Tamim Elyan here.
Follow RTRFaithWorld via Twitter Follow all posts on Twitter @ RTRFaithWorld

rss button Follow all posts via RSS

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see