FaithWorld

Guestview – Prophet Mohammad endured personal insults without retaliating – grand mufti

By Guest Contributor
September 20, 2012

(Egypt’s Grand Mufti Ali Gomaa during a Reuters interview in Cairo on March 19, 2007. REUTERS/Tara Todras-Whitehill)

The following is a guest contribution. Reuters is not responsible for the content and the views expressed are the authors’ alone. Ali Gomaa is the Grand Mufti of Egypt.

By Grand Mufti Ali Gomaa

With the publication of yet another set of insulting cartoons against the Prophet of Islam, it is becoming increasingly obvious that we are living through dangerous times, in which the world has becoming alarmingly polarized and obstinate. The current crisis has been precipitated by a number of factors. There is no one single cause to which we can point, in the hopes that eradicating it will magically solve our problems. Rather, this is a complex matter, involving the inability of each side to misunderstand the worldviews and commitments of the other. The particulars of the events of the past week are known to all, but the underlying causes are deeper and more intractable, and cannot simply be wished away.

To properly understand them necessarily means taking seriously the politics that obtain between Islam and the West at this point in history. It is naive to simply point to individual films, cartoons, or writings which explicitly seek to provoke and insult Muslims as the motivating cause of these conflagrations. Rather, one must keep in mind the many points of conflict between Muslims and Westerners that obtain all over the world today. One need only scratch the surface to uncover grave violations associated with the war on Iraq, regular drone attacks in Yemen and Pakistan, the treatment of often innocent Muslims in Guantanamo, the demonization of Muslims by far-right European parties and the banning of their symbols by European legislatures, and the conflict that has persisted for decades in Palestine. To turn a blind eye to these serious and enduring conflicts is to remain wilfully oblivious to the underlying factors which make coexistence and rapprochement between Islam and the West so difficult.

In such a context, to then insist on igniting these simmering tensions by publishing hurtful and insulting material in a foolhardy attempt at bravado – asserting the superiority of Western freedoms over alleged Muslim closed-mindedness – verges on incitement. Of all Muslim symbols, there is perhaps none more sacred than the Prophet Muhammad himself. Muslims can barely utter his name before their conscience obliges them to pray for God to bless him and grant him peace. Hundreds of millions of Muslims revere not only the Prophet, but the very city of Medina which he made his home, and ardently aspire to visit it at their first opportunity. It is no exaggeration to say that Muslims love the Prophet more dearly than their own selves, as the Qur’an characterizes them. To imagine then, crude representations of a man so dear to them is unbearable to the vast majority of Muslims.

None of this is to condone violence of any sort. Indeed, the example of the Prophet and his Companions – the greatest sources of Muslim normativity – bear witness to their enduring the worst insults from the non-believers of his time. Not only was his message routinely rejected, but he was often chased out of town, cursed at, and physically assaulted on numerous occasions. But his example was always to endure all personal insults and attacks without retaliation of any sort. There is no doubt that, since the Prophet is our greatest example in this life, this should also be the reaction of all Muslims. As the Qur’an instrucus, “Be patient, as were the great prophets.”

The call of all Muslim leaders must be to protest these instances of hate speech in only the most peaceful manner. Violence of any sort must be condemned outright. Here it is equally important to point out that some self-appointed religious leaders have failed to act responsibly. In the tense environment that currently prevails in the Muslim world, to display these provocations and to speculate on the supposed conspiracies behind them is to act recklessly. Unfortunately, the proliferation of satellite channels and other media have opened the door to all sorts of people who have only the advancement of their own interests and popularity in mind, and not the wellbeing of the Muslim nation, the Middle East, or the world at large.

Yet, there is room for hope, and our actions should spring from the optimism that the world’s religions –Islam no less than any other – are ultimately interested in achieving harmony between peoples and peace on earth. I have, throughout my tenure as Mufti of Egypt, called for strengthening the bonds between the world’s great faiths, as well as the civilizational cultures which currently divide us as much if not more than religious affiliations. In this context, I have been involved in a number of forums devoted to dialogue across what seem to be chasms of suspicion, building across them bridges of understanding. The great virtue of these forums are that the quickly allow each side to appreciate the other’s positions, and tensions soon evaporate amongst the goodwill on display, even if agreement takes more effort and discussion. This is a model that applies to not only religious leaders, who have been at the forefront of such initiatives. Political leaders, too, must look beyond their short-term benefits and adversarial attitudes, and media outlets must broaden their horizons and take seriously their responsibility to the outside world, not just their accountability to profit margins and the bottom line.

Comments
8 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

I applaud this much needed message from the Grand Mufti. It is in the spirit of the great work of ecumenical harmony of Nicholas of Cusa De Pacei Fidei. This same Cusa was instrumental in promoting the voyage of Christopher Columbus that led to the founding of the United States which enshrouds in its Constitution that very same principle.

This same spirit today cries out for a new concordance among nations and faiths in order to get on with the mission that humanity so urgently requires. This mission is the human right to meaningful work that supplies the security of food, shelter, healthcare and ultimately provides the individual an opportunity to participate in the ongoing perfection of mankind’s continuing mastery over nature. This purpose being striven for by us then will give reality to the truth that we are all created in the image of the living God.

Posted by Thingumbob | Report as abusive
 

The Prophet did not endure insults back in his day without retaliating. Wikipedia says otherwise. Please fact-check the grand mufti.

Posted by jeffp07 | Report as abusive
 

“The Prophet Mohammad’s example was always to endure all personal insults and attacks without retaliation of any sort.” So says the author of this article. My question is why doesn’t his followers practice his example? Christians tolerate abuse and don’t riot and kill. Budhists tolerate. Jews tolerate. Hindi tolerate. All other faiths tolerate and respond in peace. Only Islam attacks and kills innocents over a picture or cartoon. Why? WHY?

Posted by LosingFaith2 | Report as abusive
 

how welcome your words are!

Posted by lildeer | Report as abusive
 

The Grand Mufti’s claim that Mohammed did not retaliate to insults is the very reverse of the truth.

In my experience of trying to discuss with Muslims the vast majority are deeply ignorant (despite their protestations otherwise), or deeply in denial, of the truth about Islam.

All this problem of violent reactions to merely verbal/figurative insults or criticisms is entirely, and only, understandable in terms of two key facts about Islam:
Fact 1 – A most central principle of Islam is that its founder is considered the most perfect man whose example should be followed as ideal moral behaviour. “Verily in the messenger of Allah ye have a good example for him who looketh unto Allah and the Last Day..” – Qur’an 33:21.
Fact 2- That founder on numerous occasions ordered the killing of peaceful people who wrote poetry critiquing his rule (or otherwise challenged his authority). There’s extensive documentation of this (and much more) in the documents considered sacred by Muslims namely Qur’an, Hadiths and Sira.

If you want to know what is really behind all this violence just do a websearch for
muhammad jewish poet
and all will become clear.

Posted by Falseophobe | Report as abusive
 

Muslim on Muslim violence must be stopped too.

Posted by Leftcoastrocky | Report as abusive
 

The so-called Christians who “…don’t riot and kill…” in LoosingFaith2′s post have other ways, such as starting wars in Iraq with trumped up excuses, killing how many innocent lives as collateral damage? Christians should take a long hard look at the Grand Mufti’s statement — he is calling for peace on all sides, and real Christians need to respond in a like manner, not by being combative and abusive, not by finding fault. If we actually followed in the footsteps of the people we say we believe in (Christ, Mohammad), the world might be a better place. As it is, as long as we only pay lip service: we are just fans, as Bill Mahar so eloquently put it.

Posted by Expatbrit | Report as abusive
 

Peace begins with one’s self. All religions have a dark side. To deny it, is to be half conscious.

Posted by BuffaloGirl | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/