Thai Buddhist monk fights on even as anti-government protesters scale back

March 1, 2014

(Buddhist monk and anti-government protest leader Luang Pu Buddha Issara addresses his supporters from the stage at a protest site north of Bangkok March 1, 2014. REUTERS/Damir Sagolj)

A young Thai man and woman are on their knees, their palms pressed in supplication to the saffron-robed Buddhist monk, an anti-government protest leader, looming before them.

Accused of being pro-government spies they have been brought before the monk at a protest site in north of Bangkok by burly guards donning tinted sunglasses.

A 15-minute interrogation fails to convince the monk, Luang Pu Buddha Issara, of their innocence and he orders protest guards to keep them under close watch before striding on stage to tell supporters to fight against the “black-hearted” government of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra.

The monk’s role in political protests that have gripped Thailand – a predominantly Buddhist country – for months, has divided Thais as much as the protest itself.

He faces disciplinary action by the National Office of Buddhism, the organisation in charge of overseeing monks’ behaviour, for inappropriate conduct while the Buddhist Association of Thailand has threatened to disrobe him.

That doesn’t seem to faze the 58-year-old senior monk. Last month he led protesters to block polling stations ahead of a February 2 election, giving orders to followers during violent clashes between pro and anti-government groups at a Bangkok intersection that left at least six people injured.

Read the full story by Amy Sawitta Lefevre here.

Follow RTRFaithWorld via Twitter Follow all posts on Twitter @ RTRFaithWorld

rss button Follow all posts via RSS

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see