Fan Fare

Entertainment behind the scenes

Record Hirst art sale — should we laugh or cry?

September 23, 2008

hirst1.jpgThink what you like about the art – and several leading critics question whether it is art at all – there are enough people desperate to get their hands on an original Damien Hirst to ensure that his recent, audacious sale of 223 new works at Sotheby’s was a resounding success.

Commentators have huffed and puffed about the insanity of it all — Damien Hirst, reproducing the kind of works he has been creating for years, yet still able to earn a staggering 111 million pounds (minus commission to the auctioneer) to add to his already sizeable fortune.

But to criticise the 43-year-old, the contemporary art world’s most famous figure, is nigh impossible. After all, if people are willing to pay over eight or nine million pounds for an animal in a tank of formaldehyde, it’s not his fault.

“It is as if Hirst, tongue-in-cheek, were making a false form of his own work — and doing it deliberately to make fools of the sort of people naive and vulgar enough to spend thousands on a jewel-encrusted mobile telephone,” wrote critic Andrew Graham-Dixon in the Sunday Telegraph.

Hirst said he wanted to make the art world more “democratic” by going straight to the auction house rather than through galleries and dealers who take a much larger slice of the pie. Democracy for millionaires, that is.


Do your research. Hirst didn’t pay commission to Sotheby’s.

Posted by john | Report as abusive

Do your own research. Hirst may not have to pay commission on the £111m, but that figure includes the buyers commssion that goes directly to Sothebys and not Hirst. So the statement that Hirsts income is £111m less the commission is correct.

Posted by John M | Report as abusive

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see