Fan Fare
Entertainment behind the scenes
UPDATE- Melissa rebels, Ellen saddened by Prop 8 gay marriage ban
Comedian Ellen DeGeneres said she was “saddened beyond belief” at the decision by voters to ban the newly-won rights of gays and lesbians to marry in California.
But singer Melissa Etheridge sounds downright angry.
Etheridge, 47, who did not get to marry her partner Tammy Lynn Michaels before the Nov 4 ballot, suggested in a blog post that she would no longer pay her California state taxes because, as a lesbian, she did not now enjoy the same rights as as other Californians.
“Okay, so I am taking that to mean I do not have to pay my state taxes because I am not a full citizen,” Etheridge wrote.

DeGeneres and her longtime partner, actress Portia de Rossi, were among the roughly 18,000 gay or lesbian couples who married in California in the five-month honeymoon between same sex marriage becoming legal and then being banned in a ballot initiative known as Proposition 8.
The popular chat show host married de Rossi in August in the most high-profile same sex marriage since such unions were declared legal in California in May.
“I was saddened beyond belief. Here we just had a giant step toward equality and then on the very next day, we took a giant step away,” DeGeneres wrote on her website
“I believe one day a ‘ban on gay marriage’ will sound totally ridiculous. In the meantime, I will continue to speak out for equality for all of us,” she added.
California authorities say marriages of gays and lesbians between June and November will remain legal. Hundreds of gay rights activists held street protests in Los Angeles and San Francisco after the Prop 8 vote and have filed several lawsuits in a bid to overturn the decision.
Comments RSS
Gavin Newsom and the radical, in-your-face, gays of San Francisco have done tremendous damage to the gay agenda in the eyes of people who are working toward a more accepting view. The activities of the San Francisco Pride festival where participants actively engage in sexual acts on the streets, in broad daylight, along with other repugnant actions causes extreme damage to the gay community’s efforts toward legitimacy.
Llewd public behavior by any member of society is offensive. There have been many a straight couple engaging in sexual acts in public in San Francisco for decades. Recently a straight couple was witnessed having sex on the lawn of the court house in broad daylight at a street festival here. I was once visiting New Orleans and had the misfortune to walk past a straight couple having sex in a front doorway. Does this make anyone question the straight community’s legitimacy? This is just foolish behavior from a few individuals. How can you use something so isolated as justification for denying a group of people their civil rights. Just because you don’t notice the Gays and Lesbians who lead respectable lives, working hard, paying taxes, starting businesses, helping in the community and raising families does not mean we don’t exist. Regarding Gavin Newsom, we commend him for being brave enough to stand up and say discrimination is constitutionally wrong. As a mayor, he should be vocal on issues.
I agree with Scott Nebleman. It is interesting how many on this site are pro gay marriage, yet the majority of the people of California have said that this does not reflect their own beliefs. Obviously they do not believe that this is a matter of civil rights, but of moral beliefs. You can call someone bigoted or other choice names, yet that does not change the view. One of the problems is that there are some in the gay community who wish to promote their views in the education system regardless of the NO on 8 commercials. I am a christian who does not get to promote his views in public schools, nor should I. This was an opportunity to indoctrinate children in compliance with the law, should it have passed. I was not happy that Prop 4 did not pass. However, I am not going to send it to the CA Supreme Court so that they can overturn the decision of the people. However, now California voters have decided not once, but twice. Yet how many lawsuits are being proposed to overturn the decision on Prop 8. I guess that this is no longer a Republic any more. The voters no longer have a right to vote against what the “elite” think should be the law of the land. This is as much my state as it is yours. However, keep suing!! Maybe you can actually have a state that will by fiat determine all christians do not have a voice.
If California civil unions are not on par with those of marriage, the efforts of the gay community should be placed on amending the rules, benefits, etc of “civil unions”, not the definition of marriage, which is between that which is between two people of opposite genders.
Marriage is and allways has been between one man and one woman, period! The voters have spoken twice now! The gays can have their union but they are not ‘entitled’ to marriage. Marriage is a sacred thing intended for procreation. The gays are trying to be equal yet they’re different. They can do their thing, just get out of the faces of those of us who believe in a traditional family. The voters have spoken – again!!
Someone alsked if we are going to live now by bibical principals. UMM..we Americans do live by bibical principals. Thou shall not kill, our judicial system says that murder is punishable by death. Thou shall not steal, our justice system say that stealing is a crime. To covet a neighbors goods, bibical principals, false witness agsinst a neighbor, is also a bibical principlal and a crime in the American jsutice system. SOOOOOO..if someone steals your car..is that their right, or is it a bibical principal/american law that you want enforced. If someone murders a loved one is that their right, or is it a bibical/american law that you want enforced? You cant have it both ways. And please tell me where exactly in the COnstitution odes it say that marriage is a right? It isn’t. Marriage is a priviledge.
This doesn’t discriminate against anyone; everybody has the right to marry a person of the opposite sex. What could be more fair than that. Oh…you mean you want SPECIAL privileges due to the fact that you’ve decided to exercise your free will to live a gay or lesbian lifestyle! Why not! If you want this special privilege…move to Europe.
This whole issue would be better served if the government got out of the marriage business altogether. Every union should be a civil union. Any 2 people that want to cohabitate to raise a family, share assets or take care of each other should be able to have a civil union through the state. Marriage specifically was instituted by God and it should be kept in the church ONLY. This would satisfy all people as to equality and religious beliefs. The government should get out of the marriage business and respect separation of church and state.
Jean-Jeannie CA — Please re-read the Constitution. It DOES NOT give you freedom from religion. Rather freedom to worship as you see fit. Religion is and always will be part of civilized society so you will ALWAYS be exposed to it. Please don’t cry about, just understand that you have a right to worship.
Prop 8 was passed because a MAJORITY voted for it. In a democracy (or democratic republic to be correct) that is the way things work. It is supposed to work that way. It is a government “by the people.” If a court or official said “gays cannot marry” that is one thing, but when a majority vote is against something (something not specifically addressed by name in the Constitution) then get over it. It is law…and should be. This is still a democratic country. Good!
Marriage isn’t a right. People have been living together and procreating out of wedlock for generations. Will the use of a word make a couple feel better? If a couple is in a committed relationship, do you think the state really cares what they are doing? To remendy the situation, the state can change the laws that these people are seeking to be changed. If it doesn’t happen, there is alway Canada.
If you are gay move to Spain, a country that allows gay unions.
How does gay marriage differ from civil unions? They afford the same rights it’s just that they are not called marriage. No one is losing there rights here. Marriage to my belief is a man and a woman instituted by God I do not want my children and grand children taught that gay sex is normal by school teachers and be told that I am intolerant or don’t have a say in what my children/grand children learn in school. This is not about rights, it’s about a definition of the word marriage and the protection of our children’s minds and the parent’s right to decide the sex education of their children. We are called haters and intolerant by those who disagree with us, but who is actually being intolerant and hateful? The people of the State of California voted twice a majority vote to up hold the definition of the word marriage. This is the United States, a democracy, a government of the people, by the people and for the people. The judges job description DOES NOT include creating law. They are empowered to up hold the law of the people. The majority of the people of California have spoken, the rest who disagree need to either move to a country that agrees with them or shut up!
I’m a Pastor at a Christian Church, and even though I don’t agree with your lifestyle, I am respected to allow you free choice to do as you please, so long as it doesn’t affect the rest of society, even though everything does affect everything (butterfly effect). However, some writers on this blog really need to analyze why Prop8 voters cast their vote. Some of your comments show a lack of understanding, research, or care about what would actually happen would you get your way. Many of you are so focused on what you want, you don’t even care about what the rest of California wants, (or even the U.S, shown in voter turnout). Now, I feel for you, and desire that you have your way, as that is your own choice, and you will have to answer before God for your choices. However, because many of us have families, kids, schools, and churches, and we see already in the newspapers the schools indoctrinating our children (kindergarten, first and second grade, a father being arrested for trying to protect his son), as well as seeing how the words would change in “marriage” would also change for the church according to the laws of the land the church must follow, regardless of separation of Church and state), that there are bad people (and there are) who will use that to bring the churches down. Now, it’s not too hard to see that. It’s not too hard already to see little Johnny being taught something his parents do not want forced. Our belief is that we want freedom to raise our kids as we want and protect our families and churches from the destruction. That is my, that is our, California’s and U.S.’s main reason why we are voting yes on Prop8. Not because we don’t care or want to see you happy, it’s purely to protect our kids, churches, and families without it being forced upon us, as it is now, even with these undue riots. Do we not believe in Democracy? I mean we’re not asking a biased court to arbitrarily change the laws of abortion just because we’re still the minority in the vote, even though we promote, just as you, EQUALITY for ALL. So, how do we promote peace for both sides. It’s not easy, but one sure way is to have you get your way without it affecting traditional marriage, kids in schools, and churches. That is the only way. How do we help you come to terms and peace? How can we assist you to get what you want without taking a biblical term (marriage), and trying to change the definition just because you don’t like it? What do you really want is the question? What are you really looking for? What in essence do you NEED EXACTLY? Help me. Don’t say generic terms like equality and love. Go beyond that? What is meant by equality and love is not granted by a title? What are you really after?
Gee, I guess all you Barack Obama supporters who are gay can thank all you Barack Obama supporters who are straight for this fine kettle of fish. Enjoy the next four years.
As a gay man, I am sad about the outcome of Prop 8. As a pragmatist, I beleive the Gay Community Leaders need to work on something that will actually pass and give Gay people the actual rights they need to live prosperous and healthy lives. This of course is Civil Union Laws. The politicians that support us would be thrilled to help us pass legislation because they know that a majority of American want us to have equal rights under the law. Even Pres-Elect Obama mentione dit thoughout the campaign.
A majority of Americans do not want us to be “married”. While I understand the symbolism of this word marriage, the Gay leaders are denying their own people actual rights over a symantic issue. What is to stop a couple from having a civil union license and then going to their liberal church and getting married. While we argue over the word Marriage, Gay people lose their homes through unjust intestate succession laws. Gay people do not have the oppotunity to obtain domestic benefits from their partner’s companies. Gay people do not recieve SS survivor benifits or pension benefits. We all know the list of injustices. However, to get the word “marriage” on some license, we are walking away from obtaining everything else. I think this is a 2 step process. We can really help people if we use my strategy. Accept that the country is ready for Civil Unions and it is not ready for marriage. WE NEED ACTUAL RIGHTS. We can’t afford to waste more time on something that is not ready to be passed. Please read this and give serious thought to taking this fight in a direction that can actually give us a real victory.
I am appalled by the huge amount of narrow minded people in this state. I am also surprised that so many would vote to let the government rule yet another part of our lives and therein take more of our liberty and freedoms away. By voting in amendments such as this we are letting the government dictate how we can live and under what guidelines. I am not gay myself, but I voted no on this proposition based on the fact that I love liberty and freedom and everytime we turn around, more and more of it is being taken away from us.
Someone recently said to me that we all have the right to our own opinion and that I do agree on, but these are usually the narrow minded christians who say this and then in the same breath say anyone who does not believe as they do are wrong. Also all those out there saying that a civil union affords the same rights to gay couples as marriage are gravely mistaken. Do more research and make sure you understand the situation before you start dictating what is fact and what is not.
Hey gay folks, how about giving straight folks a break? While you whine about not being “married”, straight folks are the ones making themselves much more vulnerable in life by having and raising kids. While you and your partner fly to Fort Lauderdale on the tons of disposable income you enjoy, we’re stuck at home paying for diapers, food, and clothes for our children (for which there are no regrets). Who are the ones having and raising the children without which there would not even be a human population? That’s right, us. So cry me a river.
I don’t know how we as Americans can go internationally and demand that other foreign governments respect the human dignity and values of their minorities and espouse the virtues of democracy, while we indoctrinate our prejudice against the gay minority group in our country. So I pose this to the pastor, when you preach and promote human dignity, do you provide a small disclaimer section or amendments for gays and lesbians. Marriage is a ceremony and an affirmation of eternal love and unity for a couple, which is shared my NUMEROUS religions not solely Christian. If you supporters truly wanted to protect kids and religious institutions from prosecution, they could’ve written that explicitly in their proposition. But they didn’t, they chose to wholly write off any union between same sex couples, which sir I believe is immoral discrimination.
Oh whine, whine, whine. Too bad, the people have spoken, so live with it. Don’t you people get it, this is how a democracy works. A majority of voters go to the polls and elect an inexperienced, anti-American, Communist as president and at the same time these same people vote that marriage between two people of the same sex should be illegal. Live with it. If the courts turn over the ban on gay marriage then they should over turn the Obama victory. What is most important to gays? Obama or marriage.
I would be very pleased to trade Obama for gay marriage. America made the biggest mistake in history by electing Barack Obama as president. I hope I’m wrong, I hope he makes a liar out of me. I would love to be sitting here one year from now and be writing how Barack Obama has done a magnificent job, our economy is moving along, we have more money to spend than before. Our jobs and incomes are secure and growing and we don’t have to worry about health care and buying medicine. Terrorism has diminished and the whole world loves us. But chances are it won’t happen. So gays get used to it. You’re no more disappointed with prop 8 as I am in the election. I have to live with the election so you have to live with prop 8.
I am tired of Hollywood telling me how to vote, and how to live my life!! We voted twice – get over it!!!
Too bad, grow up. Come on Ellen this is the way the world works we win some and lose some. Obama won the presidency and gay marriage lost. And Melissa since I voted against Barack Obama and he won does that mean I should stomp my feet like a little kid and proclaim I’m not going to pay my Federal Taxes because McCain lost. Sorry girls that’s the way the ball bounces.
Desi nailed it early on and it bears repeating:
“This is not an issue of EQUALITY but rather an issue of DEFINITION. All citizens have the same marriage rights regardless of sexual orientation, and marriage IS the union between one man and one woman. If anyone should be given a special right to REDEFINE this institution, then to be fair ALL people should be given the same equal right. Sexual orientation is irrelevant.”
Exactly. If the definition is expanded to include one man/one man and one woman/one woman, then I fail to see any logical or legal reason from it further being expanded to include two men/one woman, three women/one man, one man/one child (don’t believe it couldn’t happen), etc. Thus, by defining every conceivable relationship, it effectively defines none, and becomes worthless.
So I guess power to the people, let the vote count doesn’t mean the same to gays and lesbians. You do want special treatment.
And here I thought California was totally hopeless… Family Values and Conservatism live on and the majority has spoken!! Deal with it.
Remember… Gay and Lesbian Californians DO have the exact same rights as every other Californian. They can marry a person of the opposite sex.
This ultimately is not about gay rights at all, but about the right of the free practice of religion. These Churches are attempting to preserve their right to sanction marriages as directed by their own conscience. When same-sex marriage is established as a constitutionally-protected right, it will shortly follow that it will be unconstitutional for any organization to deny this kind of marriage. Churches face the very real prospect of being forced out of marriage altogether. Whether you are religious or not, you must realize that this is a matter of the deepest and most profound significance to religions of nearly every variety around the world.
This is not a case of religions meddling in a civil rights issue at all. This is about civil authorities and politics meddling in a moral and religious issue, which is what marriage is. If there was a way to forever protect the rights of churches to sanction marriages according to their own beliefs without the prospect of civil interference, I have no doubt that they would immediately drop their support of these kinds of constitutional amendments.
Angie- You, as a gay person voting for yes on 8 should be SO ASHAMED! I have been in two lovely gay weddings this summer and because of BIGOTS and, apparently you -their love means nothing and I don’t get to marry the man that I love.
Thanks Angie- you must really hate yourself- you make me so angry.
For me, banning gay marriage is the correct thing to do, and not for any biblical reasons. The fact is, just as most legitimate studies point to the dangers of man-made global warming, most of the legitimate studies point to children being better off with a mother and a father. Sure you can find some outlier studies for anything. This is what people on the right do to bolster their opinion on global warming, and what people on the left do to bolster their opinion on gay marriage. But the facts are pretty clear. A child is better off with one mother and one father.
And the state has every right to promote those things that are good for the whole. It happens all the time. And this is no different. Gay marriage does not benefit anybody but the 2 people getting married. Traditional marriage benefits the entire country. It has nothing to do with equality.
A blind person may want to be an airline pilot. But because of what nature dealt him, he cannot. That doesn’t make him any less of a person, nor is he any less equal. Gay people are just as equal as anybody else. But through no fault of their own, nature has dealt them a hand which not only is a Darwinian biological dead-end, but also an inferior mechanism of raising children.
And sure, there is no guarantee that a child raised by gay parents will turn out bad, nor is there a guarantee that a child raised by a traditional couple will turn out great. Just as there is no guarantee that wearing a seat belt will save your life in a crash, nor is it a guarantee that not wearing one will kill or harm you. But the chances are better if you wear a seat belt. And the chances are that the child will be better off with a mother and a father. And that is why government does, and should, support things which are beneficial to the country as a whole, whether it be seat belts or traditional marriage.
most people that live in the most poverty stricken parts of the world survive because they have a traditional three generation family which is important.many people are against gay marriage because they associated it to the progressive attacks on the traditional family unit.i live in ca and see the tragedy of middle aged people who listened to the “cool people” and followed a jerry seinfelt type of lifestyle a series of brief relationships, and are sadly middle aged and emotionally bitter because no grand kids etc.so it is not only religious fanatics that oppose gay marriage,it is people who see a bad lasting side effect down the road.
Gays aren’t any more fired-up to get married than they are to join the Army. They simply don’t like being told they can’t do something. If you let them marry, they’ll find something else to complaint about. They’re unhappy because people don’t accept their lifestyle and they think legislation will change that. They’re wrong.
Fascinating discussion! however, it’s not only ‘gays’ who lose when human rights are oppressed; we ALL lose. Certainly we have all lost with this absurd battle in the continuing attempt to legislate morality across our once- democratic republic. The only surprise here is that so many posters apparently agree with Mormon morals! after all, they spent $25m pushing this through. please wake up America, before our grandchildren are living a Dickensian life in debtors prisons, with NO choice about who sleeps behind them…the gay agenda is as American as your mom’s pie!
This should be handled as a separation of church and state. Anyone who wants civil benefits registers with the state as a couple, no ceremony. Those who wish a marriage should go to whoever will marry them, government officials such as a Justice of the Peace must marry any one, while religious denominations may marry whom they please in accordance with the tenets of their faith. They will issue a certificate of marriage. For form purposes, rather than married or single, the words registered or single could be used.
Those who reject the state could be married within their church and be recognized as a married couple by the community, but would enjoy no guarantees. “Render unto Caesar ….”
Father God, I pray you will touch the hearts of all the angry people here. It is evident they do no know you. Anger is not of you, only love. I pray Lord God that you will help these persons to understand that marriage was designed by you and that you are the supreme authority. Please help them to see we are not hateful, quite the opposite, but we are opposed to trying to change a divine plan. I know from experience that following your plan leads to an awesome life. It took me 50 years to figure it out. I had a brother that was gay, I never quit loving him. Will I see him in heaven, no, I do not believe I will as you are righteous and your judgment will be upon ALL persons who ever walked this earth. We will be judged according to your WORD, many will be cast down. Lord I pray today that you will soften the hearts of the angry, regardless of what they believe. Living for the next life brings greater joy than any of the pleasures in this life. Thank you for showing me that before it was too late. In Jesus name I always pray, because he is the way the truth and the life. Amen
I get the fact that people feel it’s discrimination but there is no protected class based on sexual orientation in the U.S. Constitution and rightly so (it’s hardly the same as race). It only exists in some states where people have oddly voted to extend such protection. And, of course, constitutions and laws are made by the people to reflect the society’s values and are subject to change. I proudly voted yes on Prop 8. I don’t hate gays – I couldn’t care less who they have sex with but I don’t feel compelled to change my society to afford them special rights based on who they have sex with. People voted for Prop 8 because they wanted marriage to be between a man and a woman -the traditional, normal family unit. The people have spoken and spoken well.
Wow. Defending the definition of marriage that has been the same for thousands of years? Like when it was an arranged affair that did not require the consent of the woman (or girl for that matter if she happened to still be a child)? Like when the woman was considered property and the woman’s property was transferred to the man to do with as he pleased? Like when it was polygamous? How far back do you want to go in your zeal to protect this sacred definition? Societies evolve, communities evolve, families evolve. Hopefully for the better. Maybe not on November 4th this time, but someday.
A lot of this argument has to do with protecting children, protecting their future. So what does that mean? I’m gay and I was a child. We all were. There are 9.5 million people under 18 in California. Let’s say 900,000 or so of them are gay. In May we told those 900,000 kids that in their future, if they wanted to, they could grow up, fall in love, get married, and have a family. Normal stuff. That’s a pretty hopeful message. In November we said no they can’t. Back to being isolated, separate, somehow being not “normal”. These 900,000 kids are 3 times more likely to at least attempt suicide by the way. But who cares about a bunch of gay kids, right? Yes on 8 doesn’t need to protect them. What will we teach them in school? That’s the issue.
We can argue about whether or not marriage is part of public school curriculum. But you know what? Whether it is or not the question of who is in your family is bound to come up. So, de facto, if some families have two dads or two moms the kids are going to learn there is such a thing as gay marriage. In fact in the US 10 million kids have just such families right now. Oh, but wait. They don’t have families at all. Families start when two people fall in love and get married and have kids and their parents can’t do that. Too bad. Yes on 8 doesn’t seek to protect them either.
So I guess yes on 8 proponents are pretty much only concerned about protecting their own kids. Makes sense. BUT…. one in ten of their own kids is gay. They don’t like that, they can try to deny that, but it is a fact just like gravity. And you take away a right from them to try to protect them? You take away a hope from them to try to protect them? That just makes no sense at all.
Someone up above asked what do we really want. Good question. Many years ago I served as best man at a very close friend’s wedding. It was one man marrying one woman, by the way. Part of my best man toast was wishing well to the “new family”. Because I think that’s what marriage is. The creation of a new family. It was one of the most moving things I have ever witnessed. It felt as sacred as anything I’ve ever felt considering there wasn’t an ounce of God in the whole affair (and yet I believe the marriage is still legal. I mean after all I had to sign something as a witness). So I can’t speak for all gay people but that’s what I want. I may choose to get married someday and I may not but if I choose to I want it to be the creation of a family. Not an arrangement, not a legal matter, not a partnership, not a civil union, a family. And you do that in our society by getting married. That act alone takes care of all of it and nothing else is necessary.
Gays obviously don’t believe in democracy. And they shove gerbils up their butts too.
WOW. Orawek said, “Marriage isn’t a right.”
Dear Orawek, this is why I celebrated the election of Obama — ignorance over bigotry. Marriage IS most definitely a right. Please read “Loving v. Virginia”, wherein the United States Supreme Court found that Virginia’s miscegenation law violated both the Equal Protection clause and the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment to our Constitution. The “line” of 14th Amendment cases date back to Pierce v. Society of Sisters.
Not only is marriage a right, it is a fundamental right under our Constitution.
One last point. Some here argue that the “majority” has spoken. The Supreme Court has long held that the Bill of Rights must protect the minority against majority oppression, regarding basic freedoms and fundamental rights.
Sorry guys, but your argument that the “majority” of bigots rule is insufficient as a matter of law.
As well it should be.
Thank you Jake. Propositions advocating discrimination towards a group of people should not even make it to vote, as it is our governments responsibility to uphold the words in the constitution. Reading through these blogs, I cannot believe the ignorance people have in regards to domestic partnership. Yes it is a step in the right direction in that it does allow us to have some of the same right as a straight couple; however, people do not reallize that the rights (per the domestic partnership) come with a hitch, not present with a marriage. For example, I have my long time partner on my health insurance (to save money) and since I am not married to her, I have to declare the portion my employer pays for her healthcare as income and am taxed on it.
I would just like to know, why is there such a problem with the word “Married”? And who cares if a church refuses to marry a gay couple, there are a million more. Until the law changes rights and priveleges to include domestic partnership along with marriage, gay people are always going to fight for marriage.
In my eyes, I must respect peoples color, ethnicity, religion, age, handicap, and sex per Civil Rights Laws. What happened to sexual orientation? This whole prop8 thing was about conservative religious groups pushing their views on the population as a whole. This is just not right. If I am made to respect you then you should stay the hell out of my business and respect my beleifs as well.
The definition of the word marriage is a union between a man and a woman. You want to change the definition. Straight people are saying no, get your own term for a union between two people of the same sex. I don’t know why that is such a difficult concept for you to understand Michele. Like I said in my original comments, gays have brought this upon themselves by pushing the issue too far. They had made great strides in a very short time, but just finally went too far.
As per your article, the 18,000 same sex marriages in California are legal. Therefore, why are you calling Portia her partner.Portia is Ellen’s wife. I think you should correct your statement.
If the founding fathers even heard that there was chance of legal gay marriage in America, they would have died of shame.
Although I am idealistically opposed to the churches claiming ownership of the word “marriage”, isn’t there some room for a workable compromise here? What really needs to happen is to complete the separation of church and state; a religious ceremony should not grant you ANY additional rights. Let’s call all legal unions “Civil Unions”, and let the Churches have the word marriage (they do after all have the right to refuse to perform rites an whomever they choose). The important thing is that committed same-sex couples be treated exactly the same legally as committed opposite-sex couples. Anything less is discrimination. I am very much in favor of family values, and I do believe children do better when they have 2 parents in a committed relationship. The reality the anti-gay marriage advocates are refusing to acknowledge is that many same-sex couples CAN and DO have children… shouldn’t their children have all the same benefits that you or I have? I’m married to someone of the opposite sex, but within my lifetime my marriage would have been illegal in several states because her skin color is different than mine. We now look back at the miscegenation laws with disgust and cannot understand how rational people could have supported them; it is only a matter of time until we look back on Proposition 8 in the same way.
It seems to me that if you are to re-define marriage to the historically new concept of same sex couples then it is irrational to not also include in the definition other uses of the term that are historically quite common and internationally accepted including polygamy and other variations as well. As long as it is a freely made choice between adults there is no reason why polygamists should be denied the right to marry while gay people should be extended the right – especially while polygamy is common overseas.
It is unfortunate that gays and lesbians are confused in their thinking…I still don’t know how they explain procreation for example. It is so natural that a man and a woman have babies…it is still Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve. Don’t they get it? God help us!
I’ll keep this short because this is a dumb subject kept alive by biggots.
**** IF your were for prop 8, then read this please *****
Gay marrige is not = to polygamy
Gay marrige is not = incest
Gay marrige is not = beastiality
Gay marrige is not = Any other wild relationship you can think of.
Gay marrige is common and is a healthy union that is socialy acceptable and also conductive to a nuturing home. Expand the term marriages and then allow for distinction with phrases such as homsexual or hetero sexual merriages and afford them all the same rights and responsabilities as is demanded by any society that claims to be just and free.
Society is not asking to recognizing polygamy, incest, or beastiality. Some change in tolerance does not mean a complete change in tolerance.
I’m just blown away by peoples logic that since we shoulden’t allow incest that it means we shoulden’t allow gay marrigages?
Go meet a few gay couples, and then a few incestuel couples and learn the difference please before you vote to commit any more crimes against your neighbors.
I can’t believe that such ignorance still exists today. I am appalled by some of these close-minded comments. Religion is the great divider and in this day and age, very un-necessary. Brainwashing at it’s best. Dignan and Jake said it best… using facts to support their stance. Where do the hypocrites get their so-called facts? Some old out-dated book written by man to control other men, women, etc… They’ll never learn with their minds closed to the real truths out there. The ones based on science, history, and nature. The prop won’t stick… it’s illegal… was illegal to even be included since the Legislature can only add props to ballots.
In responds to Monroe’s comments , if you were a true Christian you would remember that the word is God and God made marriage between a man and a woman, Don’t you think that God would get upset if you keep breaking his laws and ways, he would take away his grace and protection , if some you love keeps hurting by doing the things that you told not to do eventually you would get tired of giving them chances and you would leave the relationship, do you think God would allow everybody to keep on sinning and then go to heaven?? Yes JESUS CHRIST died on the cross , he paid the price for all us, we have a chose to make, either go our own way or drop everything and go with the Lord Jesus Christ God. God would have to apologize for Sodom & Gomorrah, and the other disaster that happen when we walk away from the word, Christ hates the sin not the sinner , I am not prefect and I trust JESUS CHRIST, let the sin go move to Jesus Christ. You still have rights as a human being
Here’s the logical follow-up to Prop 8. Stay tuned…
http://www.protectrighthandedness.com
Ek, what you posted is almost identical to many things I’ve posted on other boards…and very true. No religious ceremony should convey an legal rights. That includes marriage.
The recent election has left me feeling many emotions. I have felt anger, sadness and joy. Obama won, so I feel hope and joy.
I am angry because a certain segment of our population feels that they have the right to impose their religious dogma on the rest of the population. This is a prime example as to why there needs to me a firm seperation between religion and government.
From what I understand these biggots are using segments in the Bible to back up their hateful behavior. This makes it very clear to me that the Bible has no value for me nor is it a book I will ever read.
The really sad part is that I know that some of these biggots are my neighbors, my co-workers, and possibly my friends. I do not want to know who they are. If I do, I can never look at them in the same way again. I will always remember that they think it ok to treat others in a way that is less than equal as a human being and less than as a citzen of this country.