Last week we brought you news that actor Jeremy Piven abruptly left his role in the Broadway
production of “Speed the Plow” due to what he claimed was a high mercury count in his body.
A doctor who had treated Piven later told celebrity television show Entertainment Tonight that the actor had six times the healthy amount of mercury in his system. He said the actor was an “avid sushi eater” who had the raw fish twice a day, and that he also had been taking Chinese herbs which could have contributed to the problem.
But others were skeptical including David Mamet, who wrote “Speed the Plow.” He told Daily Variety, “my understanding is that he is leaving show business to pursue a career as a thermometer.” After Sunday’s matinee performance, cast member Raul Esparza bashed Piven on stage saying that working without Piven was “the first time I really enjoyed playing this show,” according to a report on Foxnews.com.
But this one is better. On Monday, The Center for Consumer Freedom, which calls itself a nonprofit group devoted to promoting personal responsibility and protecting consumer
choice, issued a press release about “sushigate.” It said “the entire medical literation doesn’t contain a single documented U.S. case of mercury poisoning from eating fish sold in restaurants or supermarkets. ” Using a calculator at MercuryFacts.com, they reckoned Piven would have to eat 3.4 pounds of sushi-grade tuna — 108 pices of tuna sushi role every week – every week for his entire life to feel any new health risks from mercury.
We’d note that Piven’s doctor did include the detail that Chinese herbs could be involved. In any case, we’re left to wonder just how fishy is this story of Piven and mercury poisoning. Any thoughts?

Trackback
6 comments so far
No journalist worth his or her salt should ever quote the deceptive Center for Consumer Freedom. They get paid by the fish industry, among others, to discredit anti-fish stories — including medical studies that casts eating fish in a bad light.
- Posted by TracyWhether or not Piven’s story is true, Esparanza’s remarks were unecessary and in bad taste. I saw the play and despite kudos for his performance, I thought Esparanza was guilty of wildly overacting.
- Posted by KateEsparza is a mean old queen and not as good as he thinks he is. . .
- Posted by RichardI think the media is being mean spirited with their accusations that he is somehow not telling the truth. The media’s case is flimsy at best. They give no evidence other than a silly explanation that Jeremy Piven’s doctor didn’t mention herbs in the cause of his poisining. Big deal. That’s not a case to drag him through the mud. Typical media b.s.
- Posted by PeggyRaul Esparanza is wonderful.
I saw the show tonight and thought Norbert was great as Gould and saw the instant chemistry between the two.
Piven should just stay in Hollywood.
- Posted by SpencerI saw the play in November and Piven and Elizabeth Moss kept fluffing their lines. Esparza was a powerhouse and blew both of them out of the water. Piven always talks about his roots in theatre and I failed to see evidence in Speed-the-Plow.
BTW, the Mamet quote is one of the funniest quotes ever. Who knew he was funny?
- Posted by Melissa