<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson estate administrators dismiss questions about legal will</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/</link>
	<description>Entertainment behind the scenes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28776</link>
		<dc:creator>Kel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28776</guid>
		<description>oppps i meant 2004</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oppps i meant 2004</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28775</link>
		<dc:creator>Kel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28775</guid>
		<description>To The GrimLisa Marie sold Elvis&#039;s Estate for 100 million in 1004.  Just an FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To The GrimLisa Marie sold Elvis&#8217;s Estate for 100 million in 1004.  Just an FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARONA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28558</link>
		<dc:creator>ARONA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28558</guid>
		<description>oops I meant &quot;nowhere around back in the day &quot;AND i AM TIRED OF EVERYONE WNTING A PIECE OF michael&#039;s money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops I meant &#8220;nowhere around back in the day &#8220;AND i AM TIRED OF EVERYONE WNTING A PIECE OF michael&#8217;s money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARONA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28557</link>
		<dc:creator>ARONA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28557</guid>
		<description>oops I meant &quot;nowhere around back in the day &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops I meant &#8220;nowhere around back in the day &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARONA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28556</link>
		<dc:creator>ARONA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28556</guid>
		<description>I do not think it is about the family wanting money.I think it is about the FACT that Michael worked so hard all those years from age 6 til his death ,also his brothers and mother and father worked hard too. from the very beginning to years later.they do not want to see someone else have their hand in Michael&#039;s estate and I DO NOT BLAME THEM. THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO QUESTION THE VALIDITY OF THE WILL.I questioned it myself when I read it  because it appeared to be TOO EXACT (almost as if every word was worded too perfect .. like whomever wrote it wanted to make sure everything was covered..DO NOT knock the Jacksons for LOOKING OUT FOR mICHAEL ,I would rather see them with Michael&#039;s estate than other people who were noone around BACK  IN THE DAY...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think it is about the family wanting money.I think it is about the FACT that Michael worked so hard all those years from age 6 til his death ,also his brothers and mother and father worked hard too. from the very beginning to years later.they do not want to see someone else have their hand in Michael&#8217;s estate and I DO NOT BLAME THEM. THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO QUESTION THE VALIDITY OF THE WILL.I questioned it myself when I read it  because it appeared to be TOO EXACT (almost as if every word was worded too perfect .. like whomever wrote it wanted to make sure everything was covered..DO NOT knock the Jacksons for LOOKING OUT FOR mICHAEL ,I would rather see them with Michael&#8217;s estate than other people who were noone around BACK  IN THE DAY&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetneke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28550</link>
		<dc:creator>sweetneke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28550</guid>
		<description>yeah and if branca and mcclain get the money it&#039;s gone to so what&#039;s you&#039;re point everyone here no&#039;s if it was your son father or brother you wouldn&#039;t want someone outside of the family controlling your families money and just because howard wietzman said that the will is valid doesn&#039;t mean that it&#039;s valid he represents the executors of the estate so he has to put on a good face let&#039;s wait and see how this plays out katherine has got some new lawyers let&#039;s see where they take this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah and if branca and mcclain get the money it&#8217;s gone to so what&#8217;s you&#8217;re point everyone here no&#8217;s if it was your son father or brother you wouldn&#8217;t want someone outside of the family controlling your families money and just because howard wietzman said that the will is valid doesn&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s valid he represents the executors of the estate so he has to put on a good face let&#8217;s wait and see how this plays out katherine has got some new lawyers let&#8217;s see where they take this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lily</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28548</link>
		<dc:creator>lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28548</guid>
		<description>i love mj......... always have and always willrip king of pop. he died cause people wouldnt respect his private life      leave him alone at least now...I came on this article to tell u lot to mind ur own bussiness and stop trying to tell other people what they should do...And there is not need to be curious of anything, there are reasons that dont need you interfering with them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love mj&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; always have and always willrip king of pop. he died cause people wouldnt respect his private life      leave him alone at least now&#8230;I came on this article to tell u lot to mind ur own bussiness and stop trying to tell other people what they should do&#8230;And there is not need to be curious of anything, there are reasons that dont need you interfering with them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Joyce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28508</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28508</guid>
		<description>Michael could have done another will after 2002 had he wanted to; he could have named his family as executors up until the time he died - that&#039;s 7 years.  He did not change it because he wanted Mcclain and Branca.  Everything I have heard or read from people who actually knew Michael Jackson (and not just Branca and Mcclain) have all said he did not want his family in his business.  If the Jacksons get the money it is gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael could have done another will after 2002 had he wanted to; he could have named his family as executors up until the time he died &#8211; that&#8217;s 7 years.  He did not change it because he wanted Mcclain and Branca.  Everything I have heard or read from people who actually knew Michael Jackson (and not just Branca and Mcclain) have all said he did not want his family in his business.  If the Jacksons get the money it is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28501</link>
		<dc:creator>jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28501</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious as to why John Mcclain and John Branca are both listed as &quot;This is It&quot; executive producers?http://www.inbaseline.com/project.aspx?project_id=205218</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious as to why John Mcclain and John Branca are both listed as &#8220;This is It&#8221; executive producers?<a href='http://www.inbaseline.com/project.aspx?project_id=205218'>http://www.inbaseline.com/proj ect.aspx?project_id=205218</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetneke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/10/21/michael-jackson-estate-administrators-dismiss-questions-about-legal-will/comment-page-1/#comment-28497</link>
		<dc:creator>sweetneke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7100#comment-28497</guid>
		<description>also i&#039;d like to add maybe that&#039;s why barry siegel didn&#039;t want to have anything to do with the will and signed off of being an executor i wonder who verified under oath that the will was authenic was it branca, mcclain, or barry siegel if it was branca then put barry siegel under oath let&#039;s see if he saids he was in ny and actually witness michael sign the will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also i&#8217;d like to add maybe that&#8217;s why barry siegel didn&#8217;t want to have anything to do with the will and signed off of being an executor i wonder who verified under oath that the will was authenic was it branca, mcclain, or barry siegel if it was branca then put barry siegel under oath let&#8217;s see if he saids he was in ny and actually witness michael sign the will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
