<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;New Moon&#8217; sinks fangs deeper into box office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/11/29/new-moon-sinks-fangs-deeper-into-box-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/11/29/new-moon-sinks-fangs-deeper-into-box-office/</link>
	<description>Entertainment behind the scenes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/11/29/new-moon-sinks-fangs-deeper-into-box-office/comment-page-1/#comment-30611</link>
		<dc:creator>Belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7781#comment-30611</guid>
		<description>My fangs have gotten smaller????????????????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My fangs have gotten smaller????????????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/11/29/new-moon-sinks-fangs-deeper-into-box-office/comment-page-1/#comment-30599</link>
		<dc:creator>William B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7781#comment-30599</guid>
		<description>whether or not you like the movie it is a great accomplishment!  I saw the movie and was actually very disappointed...  I wont see the next one until I can get it for free from my Library.  The first one was better in my opinion.  There was so much hype and build up for &quot;New Moon&quot; and it totally failed to deliver!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whether or not you like the movie it is a great accomplishment!  I saw the movie and was actually very disappointed&#8230;  I wont see the next one until I can get it for free from my Library.  The first one was better in my opinion.  There was so much hype and build up for &#8220;New Moon&#8221; and it totally failed to deliver!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2009/11/29/new-moon-sinks-fangs-deeper-into-box-office/comment-page-1/#comment-30546</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/?p=7781#comment-30546</guid>
		<description>I love that no report has mentioned that &quot;The Twilight Saga: New Moon&quot; dropped a whopping 70% from it&#039;s first weekend release.  Yes, it still made it to #1...or did it?  I am curious to find out what the official final numbers are on Monday afternoon.  Because &quot;The Blind Side&quot; was just 2million bucks behind.  Wouldn&#039;t it be fantastic if the Sandra Bullock movie actually beats the &quot;Twilight&quot; sequel?  A 70% drop is a massive decline. Of all the movies ever released, it is ranked as the 51st largest drop for a movie in its second weekend.Oh yeah, but that&#039;s only important to report about when it&#039;s a movie that you media folks don&#039;t like.   I forgot.  You folks get to choose what is news and what isn&#039;t.It&#039;s amazing that this movie is being given such a &#039;positive spin&#039; when no other movie released in the past 10 years was ever given that consideration. LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that no report has mentioned that &#8220;The Twilight Saga: New Moon&#8221; dropped a whopping 70% from it&#8217;s first weekend release.  Yes, it still made it to #1&#8230;or did it?  I am curious to find out what the official final numbers are on Monday afternoon.  Because &#8220;The Blind Side&#8221; was just 2million bucks behind.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be fantastic if the Sandra Bullock movie actually beats the &#8220;Twilight&#8221; sequel?  A 70% drop is a massive decline. Of all the movies ever released, it is ranked as the 51st largest drop for a movie in its second weekend.Oh yeah, but that&#8217;s only important to report about when it&#8217;s a movie that you media folks don&#8217;t like.   I forgot.  You folks get to choose what is news and what isn&#8217;t.It&#8217;s amazing that this movie is being given such a &#8216;positive spin&#8217; when no other movie released in the past 10 years was ever given that consideration. LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
