Fan Fare
Entertainment behind the scenes
Jackman, Miley and those cute Slumdog kids — Oscar winners or losers?
Hugh Jackman brought his singing and dancing act to the Oscar awards ceremony and “Slumdog Millionaire” walked off with a leading 8 Oscars.
But who were the real stars of the show, and did the performances on the red carpet beat those on the stage of the Kodak Theatre in Hollywood?
Viewership for Sunday’s telecast was up from last year but how much did that have to do with new host Jackman, stars like Beyonce, and the much-anticipated best supporting actor award for Australia’s Heath Ledger after his death?
The cute “Slumdog” kids in their mini tuxedos and party dresses, flown over from Mumbai, melted the hearts of those on the red carpet.
But Miley Cyrus got the thumbs down from some fashionistas for her flouncy gown and got the “worst red carpet quote” award from readers of the Moviefone.com site for this gem.
“Hopefully I’ll be here getting something for it next year. It’s a lot more real and deeper than people would expect the movie to be,” the 16 year-old Disney teen star said of her Oscar wishes for the upcoming “Hannah Montana: The Movie.”
Sammy, you didn’t explain anything. I addressed your “core issue” in the first paragraph of my first post. Read more carefully next time.
It would be great to go to Mumbai and help out myself. Unfortunately there is no way I can afford that. I guess I will have to make do with helping out here at home.
Fan Fare @ the Oscars: Our Live Blog
***Veteran showman Hugh Jackman pulled out all the stops in his first stint as Oscar host, gamely singing and dancing his way through the night’s five best picture nominees with rarely seen Broadway flair.
In the musical number that traditionally kicks off the awards ceremony, Jackman — deadpanning that the Academy had cut back on the glitz this year because of the recession — pranced between cut-outs illustrating the reverse-aging of Benjamin Button; sat at a bare-bones set of the fictional quiz show in “Slumdog Millionaire”; roped in an ostensibly bemused Anne Hathaway to recreate the “Frost/Nixon” interview; stood on a “soapbox” Milk-crate; and, finally, stood on the top ropes of a make-shift wrestling rink as paper Oscars unfurled on either side.
“Because of the recession, everything is being downsized. Next year I’ll be starring in a movie called ‘New Zealand’,” the “Australia” actor remarked just before breaking into song.
Pundits had been undecided on Jackman before the show, given the Academy’s decision not to go with a comedian. But if the standing ovation and raucous applause from his toughest critics — the royalty of Hollywood seated in the front rows — were any indication, Jackman may just pull it off.
***Ben Stiller got laughs onstage and backstage for his riff on former Oscar nominee Joaquin Phoenix, who is giving up acting to for rapping and should get an online Oscar for his portrayal of the “Unibomber” on David Letterman. Natalie Portman should get a prize for keeping a straight face.
***Heath Ledger, the evening’s shoo-in, won a posthumous Oscar for his depiction of The Joker in “The Dark Knight.”
Backstage, Ledger’s mom, Sally Bell, said he would have been “quietly pleased” with the award.
Kate Winslet looked Amazing (she deserves the best dressed award too) and I am sooo happy she beat out Angelina!!!
High hopes for Hugh at Sunday’s Oscars
The choice of Hugh Jackman to host the Oscars on Sunday has generated plenty of talk, because he is no comedian and Hollywood is wondering how a song-and-dance man like Jackman will fare at the high-pressure job, which usually goes to funny men and women such as Billy Crystal, Jon Stewart or Whoopi Goldberg.
But average folks on the Web think the Australian actor will do just fine. In a poll on celebrity news site PopEater.com, 85 percent of respondents think he will do either “great” or “OK”. Only 15 percent of the 31,000 respondents expect Jackman will be “terrible” at hosting the Oscars.
Jackman, who stars in the upcoming film “X-Men Origins: Wolverine”, and who has hosted Broadway’s Tony awards, was chosen after last year’s Oscar broadcast, hosted by television’s “The Daily Show” star Stewart, hit a record low of 32 million U.S. viewers, compared to 39.9 million in 2007.
Oscar show producers are expected to bring a fresh look to the ceremony on Sunday, and have dropped the traditional comic opening monologue.
Web site Moviefone.com also conducted a poll and found that “Slumdog Millionaire” is the clear favorite to win the best picture Oscar.
A whopping 83 percent of respondents wanted the late Heath Ledger to win best supporting actor for his role as Joker in Batman movie “The Dark Knight,” while Kate Winslet was picked to win best actress for “The Reader” and Mickey Rourke to win best actor for “The Wrestler.”
I wrote this review about 3 months ago as I wanted to share my opinion and analysis of Slumdog Millionaire with a friend of mine after she had finally watched the movie and loved it too. She had initially refused to continue watching it, just a few minutes into in, as soon as Jamal jumps into the ditch full of s… Of course, upon my insistence she watched it and was very glad that she did. However, nearly three months later, and after the Oscars, this review/analysis can still hold its own. Read on…
Slumdog Millionaire is indeed a fantastic movie and it opens you up on so many fronts and addresses so many issues that any society, particularly India, grapples with, on a daily basis. These scenarios glare us in the face, yet we choose to believe that they do not exist. Then, we try to find comfort in the fact that as long as they do not affect us and our loved ones directly, we do not need to deal with them. It is really a good study in people’s perception of self.
To begin with, it’s a bold-faced study of India-in your face! Dirty, poverty-sticken, vibrant, and yes! Bollywood-crazy! Then you see the slums which have a life of their own. There is an order in that chaos. But, if you try to break that order, the consequences are immense! Then there is the plight of millions of poverty-stricken children who have to fend for themselves. And then there are various goons, at every corner, trying to take advantage of every situation and everybody-as is seen under the guise of orphanage in this movie.
The issue of organized-begging is addressed beautifully. How children are tortured and intentionally maimed in order to help the bigger cause of organized crime (begging is a multi-billion dollar industry in India).
Then there is the focus on the struggles of life in general and yet the addiction of “living life” keeps driving us all to live. Along the way, we care for each other in times of crises and struggles and we find out who our friends are. How some make it while others fall through the cracks! How we feel sorry for them and we just move on with our lives! How certain questions are left unanswered and how commitments are left at bay. How most of the relationships are not adhered to! How most of the promises are not kept!
Then there is the vibrancy of life. Full of color! No two people wear the same colored clothes in India, particularly the women. I love this aspect of India and Indians. Then there is the delicate balance of religions, which can rear its ugly head at the drop of a hat, as is evident by the beautiful capture of the communal riots at the start of the movie. All this and we have not even tried to scratch the surface of the theme of the movie – you can dream as big as your imagination! And, then some beyond!
I do not want to touch the Millionaire aspect of the movie – which really was all about mistrust and fame and money, which seem to be the values of any modern-day society. On the other hand the realities of life and the real-life experiences have prepared Jamal for one of the biggest challenges of his young life, yet the “powers that be” refuse to acknowledge the fact that this person may, just may, have the right answers to those questions, as is made apparent in the movie time and time again. In fact, that is the only aspect of the movie that I thought was overdone! My take was – I get it! He has been through all these situations in his life as part of his life-experiences, I get it, can we move on?
The most heart-warming moment for me was when Jamal is about to appear on the last day of Millionaire and how the entire India comes to a standstill! That sent goosebumps down my spine. It was so beautifully captured by the Director of the movie. People, irrespective of religious beliefs, in homes, shops, in the middle of the streets, etc, glued to TV and radio to see and hear what would happen to this boy from such a humble background. In him, the whole of India saw a little bit of themselves; a bit of hope; for themselves; for their own kids. Jamal was a feel-good story. He was the boy next-door. And, this all was captured beautifully by the Director and, of course, actors, etc.
But, how could you make a Bollywood movie without a song-and-dance number. It would not even be classified as an India movie. So, there it was – a colorful and melodious array of beats by A. R. Rahman at the Bombay V. T. railway station, with the hero and heroine (as they say it in India), in tow with hundreds of Indians (Bombayites), dancing to the beats. I thought it was quite cute. A. R. Rahman is turning into quite a genius!
I am so glad that such movies, with substance, have come out of India or with Indian themes recently. For me, it all started with “Lagaan”. Then, there was “Black”. Earlier this year, there was “Taare Zameen Pe” and now “Slumdog Millionaire”.
I hope Slumdog Millionaire wins big at the Oscars this coming year. I think Hollywood is moving toward breaking down barriers of language and culture. So, who knows, one of these days, a through-and-through Indian movie, of substance, just might do it! I will be happy.
I can understand the Oscar buzz surrounding Slumdog Millionaire but then there are other fantastic movies like Milk, Doubt, The Reader, Benjamin Button, etc. I hope Slumdog Millionaire wins big. I will be watching and rooting for it.
Clint Eastwood’s “Gran Torino”: Oscar roadkill
It was perhaps the biggest snub of the Oscar nominations, actor/director Clint Eastwood’s “Gran Torino” was overlooked by voters at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences with no — zero — nominations. Or, was it?
(For a slideshow of nominees, click here, and for a list of nominees, click here.)
For weeks, as the road to Oscars’ Feb. 22 ceremony in Hollywood has laid out in front of award watchers, critics and industry groups have continually turned their heads as “Gran Torino” drove by — no Golden Globes or Broadcast Critics Choice awards, no nominations by producers, directors, actors or writers guilds. You could see the roadkill on the highway.
Yet, Eastwood is a favorite of the Motion Picture Academy voters. He has won two best director and best film awards (“Unforgiven” and “Million Dollar Baby”), but never won for acting. He was the star of “Gran Torino,” and the movie and his performance have earned mostly good reviews. Moreover, the film has been a hit with moviegoers who vote with their dollars at box offices ($78 million and climbing). As a result, many award watchers believed Academy voters would make Clint’s day. But they didn’t. And the question is, did they get it right or wrong?
“The Reader,” which has been seen by few people, earned a nomination for best picture over “Gran Torino” and Richard Jenkins in “The Visitor” – a well-respected actor but hardly a household name — was nominated over Clint for best actor. Was that right?
In other surprises, Leonardo DiCaprio was shut out of the best actor category after turning in a strong performance in dark drama “Revolutionary Road,” and that film, which also starred Kate Winslet, also failed to make it in the best film and best director category with its filmmaker Sam Mendes (Winslet’s husband). Winslet did, however, land in the best actress race for “The Reader.”
And what about Batman movie “The Dark Knight.” It was 2008′s No. 1 movie at box offices, but was shut out of best director (Christopher Nolan) and best picture. The movie’s nominations — except for supporting actor for Heath Ledger – came mostly in technical categories like makeup, visual effects and sound-editing.
I was at my 22 year olds hospital bedside when this movie came out and was out of touch with regard to movies at that time. With that said, I just saw Grand Torino for the first time tonight and I have to say, “Wow, what a movie!” This movie was spectacular and I cannot believe it was snubbed at the Oscars. Clint Eastwood has always been a favorite of mine, but he out did himself with this one. I’m a 46 year old mother of 4 boys who lives on a farm in WV, so my opinion may not count for much when it comes to cinema, but I know what I like and I loved this movie! Way to go Mr. Eastwood! PS. Loved the Super Bowl commercial too! Clint Eastwood for president!
“The Dark Knight” returns to theaters in run-up to Oscars
The studio behind Batman movie “The Dark Knight” has set Jan. 23 as the date for the movie’s re-release in IMAX and conventional theaters.
Studios often re-release movies in the lead-up to the Oscars, and “The Dark Knight” has been talked about for a number of trophies.
The biggest buzz surrounds the late Heath Ledger, who played Batman’s Machiavellian arch enemy The Joker and died last year of an overdose of prescription drugs. His performance already won him a posthumous Golden Globe award for best supporting actor, and Ledger could get an Oscar nomination as well.
Industry watchers expect the re-release of “The Dark Knight” to push the film past the $1 billion mark in worldwide box office sales. The film is already the second-highest grossing movie behind the 1997 film “Titanic.”
“The Dark Knight” will play in 255 theaters in the U.S. and Canada, including 142 IMAX theaters, said studio Warner Bros. The movie will play in about 32 IMAX locations internationally, the studio said.
Segments of the film were shot in IMAX, a giant screen format that Hollywood has increasingly turned to in recent years. “The Dark Knight” last year made more than $48 million in U.S. and Canada box office sales from IMAX showings.
(Writing and reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis)
Hollywood’s best movie contenders — did they get it right?
Hollywood’s movie awards season got seriously underway with the Golden Globe nominations on Thursday. But have those who pick the best movies and actors of the year got it right?
Some pundits are already crying foul over the absence of Australian actress Cate Blanchett, Brad Pitt’s co-star in ”The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”, from the Golden Globe contenders, not to mention the fact that the San Francisco gay drama “Milk” got just one nomination, for actor Sean Penn.
And how about “The Dark Knight” – the biggest box office success of the year — which picked up a single nomination for the late, beloved actor Heath Ledger but came away empty-handed otherwise?.
Since several of the movies, including “Benjamin Button” and “Revolutionary Road” haven’t been released in theaters yet (awards voters get sneak previews of those arriving at the end of the year), it’s hard for regular movie goers to make a fair assessment at this stage of the game.
This year’s list of Golden Globe nominees is top-heavy with A-list stars. Everyone from Brad and Angelina to Leonardo DiCaprio, Tom Cruise, Meryl Streep and Anne Hathaway will likely be walking the red carpet when the awards are handed out on January 11.
But who do you think got unfairly shut out, and which nominations were most surprising? Most importantly who deserves to win the top Golden Globes, or Oscars, for 2008?
Many people have been upset by the horrible joke circulated by a leading British Executive in the Times, however others seem to think its ok ? I have written to the newspaper to complain and invite others to do also.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/bu siness/columnists/article5360902.ece
Fans want Depp and Jolie in next Batman movie
(Writing and reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis)
Give audiences a blockbuster Batman movie called “The Dark Knight” with zany villains, and all of a sudden everyone’s a casting director. A survey by movie rental company Blockbuster has found Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie — in that order — are the top two favorites of fans for starring roles in an expected next Batman film. Keith Leopard, director of film product for Blockbuster, said Depp or Jolie could really bring a Batman villain to life. However it will be up to Warner Bros, the studio behind the film, to cast the next Batman movie. The survey also listed fans most requested villains for the next Batman movie are: The Riddler (a clue-giving criminal); Harley Quinn (a Harlequin jester); Cat Woman (Batman’s bad girl love interest); The Penguin (a mobster with a penchant for umbrellas); and Bane (a muscle-bound foe). Several of those characters have appeared in Batman movies since Warner Bros launched the modern version of the movie saga in 1989. Notably, The Penguin was played by Danny DeVito in 1992 and comedian Jim Carrey took a turn as The Riddler in 1995. “The Dark Knight” has made nearly $1 billion worldwide since it opened on July 18, and the late Heath Ledger has been talked about as a possible Oscar contender for his role as The Joker in the film.
Why not Pauley Perrette as Harlequin? That would be better over all for the batman flicks than Jolie would. I mean yeah I like Jolie but she’s a heavy hitter for box office movies and not really as member of a cast. Or maybe I just don’t know what I’m talking about but hey PP seems way more plausible than J.
Is Heath Ledger Oscar-worthy?
The hype around Friday’s release of the “The Dark Knight” has reached a fever pitch, with Heath Ledger’s dark turn as the Joker generating an avalanche of posthumous Oscar buzz.
Peter Travers of Rolling Stone has called Ledger’s performance “mad-crazy-blazing brilliant,” while the sequel’s director Christopher Nolan has raved in the New York Times that Ledger’s portrayal of the sadistic makeup-caked villain is “stunning” and “iconic”.
The big-ticket Academy Award categories have typically been bereft of summer blockbuster nominees.
But is Ledger’s performance so bone-chillingly remarkable that it can survive the hype and the action-movie stigma?
As the 2006 best-picture shunning of “Dreamgirls” demonstrated, presumptive hype can lead to a snub when the Academy Award nominations are announced.
I have to say I was very disappointed that they didn’t even put Heath in the Tribute to all the people we lost. I kept looking for him and he never came up. Very sad.
“Dark Knight” gets thumbs up from Heath Ledger’s parents
The new Batman movie “The Dark Knight” has already impressed critics in advance of its Friday opening, but at its New York premier, the family of late Australian actor Heath Ledger gave the film their mark of approval. The performance of Ledger as Batman’s nemesis The Joker has sparked speculation among critics that he could win an Oscar posthumously. Kim Ledger attended the premier of his son’s movie in New York on Monday with his wife, Ines, who was Heath’s step-mother. The actor’s mother, Sally Bell, and his sister, Kate Ledger, also attended. The only close family not there was Ledger’s former partner Michelle Williams, and mother of his daughter, Matilda.
After the movie, the Ledgers released a statement quoted in various media outlets saying: “‘The Dark Knight’ is everything we hoped it would be and more. Heath loved the experience of creating this character and working on the film. We are so proud of our boy.” Kim Ledger also reportedly gave a thumbs-up sign at the premier when asked what he thought of “Dark Knight.” Ledger, 28, died alone in his Manhattan apartment in January from an accidental overdose of prescription medications. If Ledger is nominated for an Oscar for his role as The Joker, it would not be his first. He also won a nomination for his role as a gay cowboy in the 2005 film “Brokeback Mountain.”
The movie was awesome. I loved the storyline, I loved the actors, and actress, I loved everything about the Joker and the actor who played him was fantastic….and he def deserves recognition. I can’t wait to go back and see it again…IMAX rocked the house!













Yes I am glad they didn’t delete his role. Heath was always a great actor.