Male employment at an all-time low

By Felix Salmon
April 3, 2009

Beth F left a comment on my blog entry about this morning’s payrolls report:

Even though the unemployment rate hit 8.5%, 91.5% of the population is still working.

Actually, this couldn’t be more wrong; the true number is 59.9%. Heather Boushey runs the scary numbers:

The average work week fell by 0.1 hours to 33.2 hours per week in March—the lowest level since 1964 when the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tabulating this data…

The share of the U.S. population with a job is now at 59.9 percent, which is lower than any time since 1985. This is especially striking since so many women have entered the labor market since then. The fall off in the employment rate has been larger among men than women, and there are fewer men at work than at any point since the BLS began tabulating this data after World War II: 68.2 percent of U.S. men age 20 and over had a job in March, down 4.1 percentage points from a year ago.

A decade ago, the big news on the employment front was the way in which demand for labor was so great that people who had considered themselves to be out of the the labor force for years ended up getting dragged back into it. Now it’s the other way around — people who really want jobs are ceasing to look for work because they consider the job hunt to be pointless.

At some point in the next few months, it’s entirely probable that fewer than two in three working-age men will have a job. Which is why the stimulus is so necessary: if nothing else it will help with the desperately-needed task of job creation.

(HT: Yglesias)


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

68.2 percent of U.S. men age 20 and over had a job in March

Is that over 20 and under 65? if not, surely just a reflection of demographics. A lot more geezers out there these days…

Posted by Paul | Report as abusive

The huge problem this new statistic implies is that fewer men find it worthwhile to participate in the “official” economy. If we’re lucky that will only mean these guys are making a living under the table. If not, a rise in crime.

The social goodwill that results in law abiding citizens is eroding. The financiers, offshorers, and outsourcers had better prepare to huddle in their gated communities.

Posted by Fred Bosick | Report as abusive