<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pulitzer datapoint of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald A. Coffin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald A. Coffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/#comment-657</guid>
		<description>The problem with this poll is that the choices are not mutually exclusive...one could validly argue that all four are simultaneously true...I would, however, agree with Equity Private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this poll is that the choices are not mutually exclusive&#8230;one could validly argue that all four are simultaneously true&#8230;I would, however, agree with Equity Private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Epicurean Dealmaker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>The Epicurean Dealmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/#comment-655</guid>
		<description>All financial journalism pieces submitted to the committee were mistakenly included in the Fiction category by an intern, who could not fathom that the incidents reported could be anything other than make believe.  Once there, the judges rejected them as too outlandish and implausible even for fiction.  QED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All financial journalism pieces submitted to the committee were mistakenly included in the Fiction category by an intern, who could not fathom that the incidents reported could be anything other than make believe.  Once there, the judges rejected them as too outlandish and implausible even for fiction.  QED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ironman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ironman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/#comment-653</guid>
		<description>The Pulitzer Prize committee also isn&#039;t hip to this whole &quot;blogging&quot; thing.  As a result, they&#039;re probably unaware of most of the best stuff out there.

Speaking of which, please do make sure you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;remember to submit this&lt;/a&gt; for consideration for next year&#039;s awards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pulitzer Prize committee also isn&#8217;t hip to this whole &#8220;blogging&#8221; thing.  As a result, they&#8217;re probably unaware of most of the best stuff out there.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, please do make sure you remember to submit this for consideration for next year&#8217;s awards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservadick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservadick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>I see the NYT won in the Anti-Americana &amp; Obama Hagiography categories, among others.  Walter Duranty would be proud.  You need to do more for the cause if you want to win, Felix!  Here&#039;s a novel idea: blame the mortgage crisis on James G. Watt or Ed Meese - that should get you noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the NYT won in the Anti-Americana &amp; Obama Hagiography categories, among others.  Walter Duranty would be proud.  You need to do more for the cause if you want to win, Felix!  Here&#8217;s a novel idea: blame the mortgage crisis on James G. Watt or Ed Meese &#8211; that should get you noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Equity Private</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Equity Private</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/20/pulitzer-datapoint-of-the-day/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>E: A and B are correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E: A and B are correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
