Comments on: Eli Broad’s art model http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/29/eli-broads-art-model/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: joyce pomeroy schwartz http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/29/eli-broads-art-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1057 Fri, 01 May 2009 04:15:30 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/29/eli-broads-art-model/#comment-1057 I would not have a Richard Prince in my collection. some are interesting, but not that interesting. My art is an accumulation, not a collection about my life exploring art and reflects my long term visual interests. the financial aspect is Peripheral to my pleasure in owning and living with my art. This is probably why i do not have big investment art nor do i need it. Most of my art has appreciated. it is part of art history.

There are collections that not promoted. Shouldn’t we be discover why they exist and what art they collect? what value they have and how it holds up.

Good and great art will always prevail. As one of my clients, I have 2) said. I am a value advisor. He undrstands that better tha i do.

]]>
By: Lance Knobel http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/29/eli-broads-art-model/comment-page-1/#comment-965 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:56:53 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/29/eli-broads-art-model/#comment-965 There are Old Masters I’d love to have on my walls. And there is contemporary art I’d love to have on my walls. Desire of the two isn’t mutually exclusive.

Perhaps something happens to taste when you can afford to put a $2.5 million painting on the wall. All of a sudden you think, “Yes to Prince, no to Titian.”

]]>