<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bailout math, BAC edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Luciani</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Luciani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>How can you tell which issue of private preferred is likely to be converted? I own BMLPRL. Is it worth hanging onto?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you tell which issue of private preferred is likely to be converted? I own BMLPRL. Is it worth hanging onto?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dzidzikashvili</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dzidzikashvili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>The problem is the government in this case, they put themselves in this scenario, they should have been able to acquire majority shares by now and restructure not only BoA, but all the other bailed out, failed financial institutions. Another source of the controversy could be the stress-tests, how they are being conducted and formulated and how to interpret results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is the government in this case, they put themselves in this scenario, they should have been able to acquire majority shares by now and restructure not only BoA, but all the other bailed out, failed financial institutions. Another source of the controversy could be the stress-tests, how they are being conducted and formulated and how to interpret results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce fields</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>see 2 posts up - if another, competitive blogger posted something so wrong Felix would be all over them (i.e dealbreaker) - wonder why he hasn&#039;t taken this down yet and saved embarassment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see 2 posts up &#8211; if another, competitive blogger posted something so wrong Felix would be all over them (i.e dealbreaker) &#8211; wonder why he hasn&#8217;t taken this down yet and saved embarassment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: at</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>at</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>well, obviously they dont want to 

and you saw this http://www.slate.com/id/2217811</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, obviously they dont want to </p>
<p>and you saw this <a href='http://www.slate.com/id/2217811'>http://www.slate.com/id/2217811</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>I am not surprised that Felix is disseminating inaccurate information, but doing it in a witty manner so I guess that&#039;s something.

Govt set the price of conversion at $6 something back in early february.  Therefore it makes no sense to convert govt preferred, but to make an offer to the private preferreds.  Say something like offering to exchange their  current preferreds for mandatory convertible preferred with a conversion price of say $20 a share.  Most of the preferred shareholders would jump at an offer like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not surprised that Felix is disseminating inaccurate information, but doing it in a witty manner so I guess that&#8217;s something.</p>
<p>Govt set the price of conversion at $6 something back in early february.  Therefore it makes no sense to convert govt preferred, but to make an offer to the private preferreds.  Say something like offering to exchange their  current preferreds for mandatory convertible preferred with a conversion price of say $20 a share.  Most of the preferred shareholders would jump at an offer like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>If BofA is to convert prefs, surely it would ape Citi&#039;s humbling deal and do half in govt prefs and half in private? They have $33bn of private prefs, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If BofA is to convert prefs, surely it would ape Citi&#8217;s humbling deal and do half in govt prefs and half in private? They have $33bn of private prefs, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Freund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Freund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>Once they convert the entire $45 billion, which seems likely given the continued losses in CRE that are just beginning to surface, this will equate to more like 40% ownership, correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once they convert the entire $45 billion, which seems likely given the continued losses in CRE that are just beginning to surface, this will equate to more like 40% ownership, correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pietro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Pietro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/07/bailout-math-bac-edition/#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>What &quot;luck&quot; indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8220;luck&#8221; indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
