Comments on: More squabbling at the WTC site http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/20/more-squabbling-at-the-wtc-site/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: BG http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/20/more-squabbling-at-the-wtc-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1778 Thu, 21 May 2009 09:11:18 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/20/more-squabbling-at-the-wtc-site/#comment-1778 Siverstein paid rent on the site for 8 years – for what? If the design process had been just in the hands of the Port Authority (Pataki) it would be a bigger fiasco than it is already. Original WTC plans for the plaza were a terrazzo map of the world, but they ran out of money, thats why it was dismal. You are right that breaking up the super block and the windowless 20 stories can not be justified.

]]>
By: Paul Rosa http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/20/more-squabbling-at-the-wtc-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1741 Wed, 20 May 2009 16:07:29 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/20/more-squabbling-at-the-wtc-site/#comment-1741 Since the attack and collapse of the buildings and Mr. Silverstein’s collection of insurance from over 20 insurers – many of whom did not even know at the time that they had become insurers for the project until after the fact – why didn’t the man just take the money and invest in less dangerous and notorious properties? The fact that the project has gone so slowly suggests that is probably what he has been doing. NY real estate is full of wanna be empire builders.

How much simpler and more coordinated the redesign process would have been had it all been in the hands of the Port Authority alone. Mr. Silverstein ignored the competition selection for the final design and found his own architect.

He must have known at the time that even the 3 to 4 bln he collected from insurance wouldn’t be enough for a complete rebuilding of the site.

The project has been nothing more than a paring down of any designs for either the site or the buildings since.

Now it seems that any new buildings will face the same difficulty finding tenants that the first towers faced. They sat semi-occupied for at least ten years with only some state offices partially occupying one of the towers and perhaps a few other tenants but not enough to make the buildings as profitable as the Port Authority had hoped. It didn’t see full occupancy until late into the 80’s I have read.

And other than their awesome size there was hardly anyone – man on the street of architectural critic – who ever really liked them. The public plaza was supposed to be Yamaguchi’s invocation of a Venetian piazza. But all black? The new buildings look like they won’t even have awesome size going for them. And the last time I looked, the NYC Fire Dept. was insisting that the first two hundred feet of the so called Freedom Tower be a windowless foundation of poured concrete. What does anyone do with a building that has 20 stories of windowless spaces starting at street level?

And why did the urban designers who wrote the master plan for the site insist on breaking up a super block with the restoration of Greenwich Street when it is so difficult to assemble a super block at all in a city as expensive as NYC?

]]>