Comments on: The SEC’s doomed reinvention attempt http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/04/the-secs-doomed-reinvention-attempt/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Brown Ram http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/04/the-secs-doomed-reinvention-attempt/comment-page-1/#comment-2470 Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:28:38 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/04/the-secs-doomed-reinvention-attempt/#comment-2470 There are really several problems that get bundled together.
1. The SEC is a captured regulatory body. The revolving door just spins too quickly and the money is just too good on the other side. I don’t know how to solve this.
2. The SEC was designed for a narrow set of purposes and over time, through deregulation, businesses have escaped regulation. This can be solved by broadening the commission of the SEC. For example, the SEC is really doing several jobs: (i) it regulates the issuance of securities, (ii) it regulates fraud in the secondary market, (iii) it regulates (directly and indirectly) brokers to make sure that they don’t rip off customers, (iv) it regulates (directly and indirectly) brokers to make sure that market making and the securities markets generally are working, (v) it regulates investment advisors to make sure that they don’t rip off their clients, (vi) it regulates investment companies for the same reasons, and (vii) it regulates holding companies. There are probably more functions. Before you go off tarring the SEC with a broad brush, look at what has worked and what hasn’t.
3. The SEC screwed up by not being imaginative enough in the ways that criminals operate. For example, I can easily imagine the scenario where the SEC examiners looking into Madoff and other fraudsters had a checklist of items to look out for, checked off their list, and then stopped looking.
4. Politicians and journalists and the public are sending conflicting signals about what they want the government and regulators to do. On the one hand, they want an active enforcer of the laws and fraud fighter, on the other hand, they don’t want an intrusive, powerful regulator. As in all things in life, you can have one, but not both. Given a choice, I think that we’re better off with lighter regulation and harsher penalties.

]]>
By: The Epicurean Dealmaker http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/04/the-secs-doomed-reinvention-attempt/comment-page-1/#comment-2401 Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:17:49 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/04/the-secs-doomed-reinvention-attempt/#comment-2401 I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Burn it down. Start over.

You cannot reform a clotted, sclerotic bureaucracy like the SEC as it currently stands, any more than you can untie the Gordian Knot. You must cut it.

http://epicureandealmaker.blogspot.com/2 009/06/these-dark-satanic-mills.html

]]>