Opinion

Felix Salmon

Chart of the day: Bicyclists up, injuries down

By Felix Salmon
June 5, 2009

This is not nearly as counterintuitive as it might seem at first blush:

safety_in_numbers.jpg

By my calculations, these numbers mean that you’d need to ride your bike in NYC for 7,300 days, on average, before getting injured. At 200 days a year, that’s over 35 years. And I’m quite sure that a large proportion (but by no means all) of the injuries and fatalities happen to people riding unsafely — against traffic, through red lights, without a helmet, that kind of thing. Which means that the odds of a safe bicyclist being injured in NYC are even lower than that.

Going forwards, the safety in numbers effect is going to make cycling even safer and more popular, which means that we should be able to extrapolate the blue line up and the brown line down more or less indefinitely. Good news!

Comments
6 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

The helmet thing is controversial. If people feel like they have to wear a helmet, they think biking is dangerous, so they drive, get fat, and die from heart disease. Danish cycling activists think the recent helmet promotion there has hurt biking.

http://hembrow.blogspot.com/2008/09/thre e-types-of-safety.html

http://hembrow.blogspot.com/2009/03/dutc h-cycling-retains-its-popularity.html

http://www.howwedrive.com/2008/10/01/to- wear-or-not-to-wear-and-is-that-even-the -right-question-ian-walker-on-cycle-helm ets/

(I feel naked without mine though. Been wearing it so long it’d be impossible to stop now)

 

“…which means that we should be able to extrapolate the blue line up and the brown line down more or less indefinitely.”

…ah yes. No doubt it was after plugging those numbers into a Gaussian copula function that you were able to confidently predict that one-way trend line. Securitize it!

Posted by Gene | Report as abusive
 

i have another theory. i stopped riding my bicycle in NY in late 2005. now that i am off the streets, they are far more safe for bicyclists.

Posted by q | Report as abusive
 

Actually I live on a busy cycle route and the general behaviour of cyclists is deplorable. Stop and yield signs are totally ignored as are pedestrian crossings and red lights. Groups often ride abreast blocking half of the road. If the numbers of these people is going up it just goes to show that good old US entitlement is alive and kicking in these troublesome times.

Posted by Oliver James | Report as abusive
 

another thing: i’m sure that ridership went up and casualty rates went down when they opened the west side route which was completely out of traffic — plus opening the bike path on the williamsburg bridge helped too though i think that happened before 2005. so i am sure that the whole story is more nuanced than the graph indicates.

also: riding without a helmet shouldn’t distinguish between injury and no injury, though it can change the severity of an injury.

Posted by q | Report as abusive
 

riding without a helmet…anyone care to recall a certain Pittsburgh starting QB doing that a few years back ?? There is NO way I would ride without one

to quote N. Dynamite…lucky

Posted by Griff | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •