<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where are the baseline stress-test results?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/09/where-are-the-baseline-stress-test-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/09/where-are-the-baseline-stress-test-results/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/09/where-are-the-baseline-stress-test-results/comment-page-1/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/09/where-are-the-baseline-stress-test-results/#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>&quot;If we knew how much difference there was between the baseline test and the more-adverse test....&quot;
We DO know the difference &quot;in aggregate&quot; as Treasury released indicative loss rates for both the baseline and adverse scenarios. Ball park figures losses are about 35% lower under the baseline scenario than the adverse one, so you can extrapolate the capital needed &quot;in aggregate&quot; under the baseline scenario. I think it would have been unwise to release the data per bank as that would give infornmation that could be exploited against individual banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If we knew how much difference there was between the baseline test and the more-adverse test&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
We DO know the difference &#8220;in aggregate&#8221; as Treasury released indicative loss rates for both the baseline and adverse scenarios. Ball park figures losses are about 35% lower under the baseline scenario than the adverse one, so you can extrapolate the capital needed &#8220;in aggregate&#8221; under the baseline scenario. I think it would have been unwise to release the data per bank as that would give infornmation that could be exploited against individual banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: q</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/09/where-are-the-baseline-stress-test-results/comment-page-1/#comment-2562</link>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/09/where-are-the-baseline-stress-test-results/#comment-2562</guid>
		<description>not quite.  there are multiple dimensions to the inputs, so you would need several independent observations to do a linear extrapolation.  or if i&#039;m not correct, can you explain what how to do what you suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not quite.  there are multiple dimensions to the inputs, so you would need several independent observations to do a linear extrapolation.  or if i&#8217;m not correct, can you explain what how to do what you suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
