Adventures in causality, WSJ edition

By Felix Salmon
June 23, 2009
It seems that the dollar is falling because oil prices are going up, and oil prices are going up because the dollar is falling. Clever! " data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

An eagle-eyed reader spotted this pair of headlines on the WSJ home page this morning:

WSJ---06-23.jpg

It seems that the dollar is falling because oil prices are going up, and oil prices are going up because the dollar is falling. Clever!

2 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

One of the salutary effects of volatility is the occasional appearance of two headlines at the same time in which the same cause is said to have triggered both the rally and the drop. It’s been a couple months since I’ve seen that, though; the end of the world isn’t what it used to be.

that is a lot financial journalism, including reuters’. when you don’t know why things happen or can’t find anything interesting to peg a market event to, just shove two different events together, joining them with an ‘as’ or ‘amid’.
reporting can be pretty boring sometimes.

Posted by Gao Zhi | Report as abusive