<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regulatory datapoint of the day, SEC edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/23/regulatory-datapoint-of-the-day-sec-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/23/regulatory-datapoint-of-the-day-sec-edition/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/23/regulatory-datapoint-of-the-day-sec-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/23/regulatory-datapoint-of-the-day-sec-edition/#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>One man&#039;s &quot;prudent... beefing up... [of] reserves in anticipation... [of a less healthy] economic environment&quot; is another man&#039;s cookie jar earnings-smoothing shenanigans.

I guess I come down closer to the side of the SEC in this particular case, which should not be interpreted as an endorsement.  Perhaps because I never bought the argument that accounting rules can be somehow &quot;pro-cyclical&quot; (whatever that means).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One man&#8217;s &#8220;prudent&#8230; beefing up&#8230; [of] reserves in anticipation&#8230; [of a less healthy] economic environment&#8221; is another man&#8217;s cookie jar earnings-smoothing shenanigans.</p>
<p>I guess I come down closer to the side of the SEC in this particular case, which should not be interpreted as an endorsement.  Perhaps because I never bought the argument that accounting rules can be somehow &#8220;pro-cyclical&#8221; (whatever that means).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/23/regulatory-datapoint-of-the-day-sec-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3069</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/23/regulatory-datapoint-of-the-day-sec-edition/#comment-3069</guid>
		<description>Tom,
That&#039;s true only if the bank then does not assume more liabilities.  As we&#039;ve seen in banking recently, more equity more more opporutunities to leverage that equity.  Thus, when the inevitable losses occur, the bank then becomes overleveraged without sufficient reserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
That&#8217;s true only if the bank then does not assume more liabilities.  As we&#8217;ve seen in banking recently, more equity more more opporutunities to leverage that equity.  Thus, when the inevitable losses occur, the bank then becomes overleveraged without sufficient reserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lindmark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/23/regulatory-datapoint-of-the-day-sec-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3065</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Lindmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/23/regulatory-datapoint-of-the-day-sec-edition/#comment-3065</guid>
		<description>If profits go to retained earnings instead of a loan loss reserve what&#039;s the difference? You just reverse the flow when loan losses increase. There would be a difference if profits were paid out in the form of dividends but I don&#039;t believe that happened. Net, net there shouldn&#039;t be any effect on overall solvency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If profits go to retained earnings instead of a loan loss reserve what&#8217;s the difference? You just reverse the flow when loan losses increase. There would be a difference if profits were paid out in the form of dividends but I don&#8217;t believe that happened. Net, net there shouldn&#8217;t be any effect on overall solvency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
