<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The upside of being flamed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padmini</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3820</link>
		<dc:creator>Padmini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3820</guid>
		<description>Loved this post; my co-blogger and I recently ran into this debate on our relatively new blog. My co-blogger tackled the issue head on in a post: http://blog.beliefnet.com/everydayethics/2009/06/blog-commenting-courtesy-do-bloggers-have-a-right-to-expect-it.html

I&#039;m learning to respect the constructive thoughts, and thicken my skin against some of the nastier comments.

One memorable comment was in reply to a post I wrote regarding the Palin vs. Letterman feud. The comment, to summarize, called me a woman who is loose with physical affection and also had some things to say about my genetalia. I was confused and slightly horrified by the connection, to say the least!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post; my co-blogger and I recently ran into this debate on our relatively new blog. My co-blogger tackled the issue head on in a post: <a href='http://blog.beliefnet.com/everydayethics/2009/06/blog-commenting-courtesy-do-bloggers-have-a-right-to-expect-it.html'>http://blog.beliefnet.com/everydayethics &nbsp;/2009/06/blog-commenting-courtesy-do-bl oggers-have-a-right-to-expect-it.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m learning to respect the constructive thoughts, and thicken my skin against some of the nastier comments.</p>
<p>One memorable comment was in reply to a post I wrote regarding the Palin vs. Letterman feud. The comment, to summarize, called me a woman who is loose with physical affection and also had some things to say about my genetalia. I was confused and slightly horrified by the connection, to say the least!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3785</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3785</guid>
		<description>Of course, this is assuming the blogger actually checks their facts. More often than not, bloggers tune out things that they disagree with, not just flames.  

And god forbid you should get bloggers to ever publicly admit a mistake...say...Megan McArdle for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, this is assuming the blogger actually checks their facts. More often than not, bloggers tune out things that they disagree with, not just flames.  </p>
<p>And god forbid you should get bloggers to ever publicly admit a mistake&#8230;say&#8230;Megan McArdle for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that the bloggers develop a thick skin (or stop blogging or turn off comments).

But it&#039;s still tiresome and annoying for most readers to have to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that the bloggers develop a thick skin (or stop blogging or turn off comments).</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s still tiresome and annoying for most readers to have to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3465</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3465</guid>
		<description>One certainly learns spewers speak volumes, about themselves, and are best ignored since nothing you say can top what they have already said about themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One certainly learns spewers speak volumes, about themselves, and are best ignored since nothing you say can top what they have already said about themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Weisenthal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3450</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Weisenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3450</guid>
		<description>Frommer? No way. 

Carney. No comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frommer? No way. </p>
<p>Carney. No comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarneyRat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3442</link>
		<dc:creator>CarneyRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3442</guid>
		<description>Carney is still a moron. Please don&#039; engage him or that thick as a brick Frommer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carney is still a moron. Please don&#8217; engage him or that thick as a brick Frommer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Weisenthal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3441</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Weisenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3441</guid>
		<description>I wonder why notorious comment deleter J Brad Delong hasn&#039;t grown this thick skin yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why notorious comment deleter J Brad Delong hasn&#8217;t grown this thick skin yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3438</link>
		<dc:creator>donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3438</guid>
		<description>I think just as was pointed out by Unsympathetic, those who can&#039;t handle comments end up turning them off. Which always leads to me not bothering to read their blogs anymore, since then I know they&#039;re just spewing and not listening. So, thanks for still listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think just as was pointed out by Unsympathetic, those who can&#8217;t handle comments end up turning them off. Which always leads to me not bothering to read their blogs anymore, since then I know they&#8217;re just spewing and not listening. So, thanks for still listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Salmon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix Salmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>Adam, just off the top of my mind, try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/economonitor/170333/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.felixsalmon.com/002445.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. There are lots more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, just off the top of my mind, try here or here. There are lots more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3436</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3436</guid>
		<description>Funny you posted this.  I was just thinking a couple days ago that I couldn&#039;t recall ever reading a blog post where you unequivocally admitted you were wrong (though I wouldn&#039;t limit this critique to you when it gomes to finance/econ bloggers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you posted this.  I was just thinking a couple days ago that I couldn&#8217;t recall ever reading a blog post where you unequivocally admitted you were wrong (though I wouldn&#8217;t limit this critique to you when it gomes to finance/econ bloggers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unsympathetic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3435</link>
		<dc:creator>Unsympathetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3435</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to see the comments posted to hardcore Republican blogs.

Unfortunately, Mankiw disabled comments on his blog years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see the comments posted to hardcore Republican blogs.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Mankiw disabled comments on his blog years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/comment-page-1/#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/30/the-upside-of-being-flamed/#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>Stupid post from a stupid blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid post from a stupid blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
