<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday links reminisce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/comment-page-1/#comment-3936</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/#comment-3936</guid>
		<description>Agree with all about truth in advertising and why treat it differently than Kosher, Halal, etc.

That said, it seems bonkers to you because never was there a diet more perfectly suited to be marketed to people with OCD, which perhaps you don&#039;t have. Every Vegan I&#039;ve met very clearly getting way more satisfaction from obsessing over their food choices than the many actual benefits there may be to Veganism. Just sayin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with all about truth in advertising and why treat it differently than Kosher, Halal, etc.</p>
<p>That said, it seems bonkers to you because never was there a diet more perfectly suited to be marketed to people with OCD, which perhaps you don&#8217;t have. Every Vegan I&#8217;ve met very clearly getting way more satisfaction from obsessing over their food choices than the many actual benefits there may be to Veganism. Just sayin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/comment-page-1/#comment-3660</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/#comment-3660</guid>
		<description>Even as a non-vegan (a.k.a. &#039;normal&#039;), I found the article fascinating.  It was an insanely devoted expose to a small special interest that you can only find on a blog as it would never survive unedited in print.  Not totally unlike some of the stuff that you write about...

C&#039;mon - surely you shouldn&#039;t decry one of your own!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as a non-vegan (a.k.a. &#8216;normal&#8217;), I found the article fascinating.  It was an insanely devoted expose to a small special interest that you can only find on a blog as it would never survive unedited in print.  Not totally unlike some of the stuff that you write about&#8230;</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon &#8211; surely you shouldn&#8217;t decry one of your own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/comment-page-1/#comment-3562</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/#comment-3562</guid>
		<description>Actually, as a vegan I found the article fascinating and a little scary.   It made me realize that what I am assuming is vegan may not be.   As the other posters said, THIS IS IMPORTANT.

First, there is the food allergies issue.
Second, there is a pure &quot;truth in advertising&quot; issue.
Third, there should not be a different standard for say a kosher deli serving non-kosher food vs a vegan restaurant serving non-vegan food.

Great blog overall, but a wrong call here I am afraid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, as a vegan I found the article fascinating and a little scary.   It made me realize that what I am assuming is vegan may not be.   As the other posters said, THIS IS IMPORTANT.</p>
<p>First, there is the food allergies issue.<br />
Second, there is a pure &#8220;truth in advertising&#8221; issue.<br />
Third, there should not be a different standard for say a kosher deli serving non-kosher food vs a vegan restaurant serving non-vegan food.</p>
<p>Great blog overall, but a wrong call here I am afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Elaine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>So it&#039;s bonkers to make sure that what a restaurant says it&#039;s serving is what it is actually serving?  Forget the whole &quot;vegan as a lifestyle angle.&quot; Ever heard of food allergies? I would think so, considering you&#039;re supposedly in the news business (which is what your blog on Reuters would lead people to believe), but perhaps I&#039;m mistaken about that.

I&#039;m not vegan (though I am vegetarian) and I don&#039;t have any life-threatening food allergies, but there is nothing wrong with people wanting to know what&#039;s in the food they&#039;re eating. Unless, of course, you happen to like ingesting melamine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s bonkers to make sure that what a restaurant says it&#8217;s serving is what it is actually serving?  Forget the whole &#8220;vegan as a lifestyle angle.&#8221; Ever heard of food allergies? I would think so, considering you&#8217;re supposedly in the news business (which is what your blog on Reuters would lead people to believe), but perhaps I&#8217;m mistaken about that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not vegan (though I am vegetarian) and I don&#8217;t have any life-threatening food allergies, but there is nothing wrong with people wanting to know what&#8217;s in the food they&#8217;re eating. Unless, of course, you happen to like ingesting melamine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/comment-page-1/#comment-3477</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/#comment-3477</guid>
		<description>Is &quot;bonkers&quot; a good thing in the UK, or does it mean &quot;deranged&quot; to you, too?  Because I&#039;m not sure I follow.  I&#039;m a gleeful carnivore, but I don&#039;t disparage the improtance of veganism to those who practice it.  If a &quot;Kosher&quot; restaurant&#039;s fare turned out to be tainted with shellfish, that would obviously be a problem, wouldn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;bonkers&#8221; a good thing in the UK, or does it mean &#8220;deranged&#8221; to you, too?  Because I&#8217;m not sure I follow.  I&#8217;m a gleeful carnivore, but I don&#8217;t disparage the improtance of veganism to those who practice it.  If a &#8220;Kosher&#8221; restaurant&#8217;s fare turned out to be tainted with shellfish, that would obviously be a problem, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/comment-page-1/#comment-3473</link>
		<dc:creator>Griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/01/tuesday-links-reminisce/#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>re the Madoff sitch, while feeling empathy for those involved...tough cookies.  Enjoyed the free ride while it lasted, of that there is no doubt.  I do think those feeder funds provided no discernable service for the sizable fees those entities received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re the Madoff sitch, while feeling empathy for those involved&#8230;tough cookies.  Enjoyed the free ride while it lasted, of that there is no doubt.  I do think those feeder funds provided no discernable service for the sizable fees those entities received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
