<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food TV chart of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>sailing the rough rude sea</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4088</link>
		<dc:creator>ac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4088</guid>
		<description>fancyfastfood.com will tell you how to make repulsive food attractive, but don't offer any solutions for improving the attractiveness of those doing the preparations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fancyfastfood.com will tell you how to make repulsive food attractive, but don&#8217;t offer any solutions for improving the attractiveness of those doing the preparations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>Truff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>Does the same graph work for how much of a douchebag that chef is (with Guy Fieri being a perfect 10)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the same graph work for how much of a douchebag that chef is (with Guy Fieri being a perfect 10)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjuns</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>arjuns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4069</guid>
		<description>What about Bear Grylls - host of Man vs. Wild on Discovery Channel, regularly devouring scorions, bugs, raw fish, etc. - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Grylls 

Another outlier to the general relationship posited here??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Bear Grylls - host of Man vs. Wild on Discovery Channel, regularly devouring scorions, bugs, raw fish, etc. - see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Grylls" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Grylls</a> </p>
<p>Another outlier to the general relationship posited here??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chappy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4061</link>
		<dc:creator>chappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4061</guid>
		<description>This 'study' clearly ignores Iron Chef.  Mario Batali is not the most handsome man on the show, yet his food always looks excellent and he seems to win at a fairly high rate.

Also, I believe there is a show that has a reasonably attractive woman that cooks low-calorie food.  At a minimum this food always sounds terrible to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8217;study&#8217; clearly ignores Iron Chef.  Mario Batali is not the most handsome man on the show, yet his food always looks excellent and he seems to win at a fairly high rate.</p>
<p>Also, I believe there is a show that has a reasonably attractive woman that cooks low-calorie food.  At a minimum this food always sounds terrible to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don the libertarian Democrat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4033</link>
		<dc:creator>Don the libertarian Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4033</guid>
		<description>Suppose the host wore an outfit that disguised their looks. Would the food have to be bland?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suppose the host wore an outfit that disguised their looks. Would the food have to be bland?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hendry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hendry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4032</guid>
		<description>"why is it that repulsive food is good for ratings if the host is not attractive, but bad for ratings if the host is attractive?"

In TV and movies, villains are always ugly. Therefore, the audience probably likes to see the unattractive host suffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;why is it that repulsive food is good for ratings if the host is not attractive, but bad for ratings if the host is attractive?&#8221;</p>
<p>In TV and movies, villains are always ugly. Therefore, the audience probably likes to see the unattractive host suffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NNM4</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>NNM4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/12/food-tv-chart-of-the-day/#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>1)  It's Giada De Laurentiis, not Gianna.  Honest mistake.

2)  Giada De Laurentiis is an 11, not a 10.  Another honest mistake.  

3) There is a chance that cause and effect is reversed here.  That a woman can cook beautiful food MAKES her beautiful, as the happiest husbands know well.  Men I don't know so much about.

4)  This post, all by itself, justifies the existence of the blogosphere.  Thank you Felix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)  It&#8217;s Giada De Laurentiis, not Gianna.  Honest mistake.</p>
<p>2)  Giada De Laurentiis is an 11, not a 10.  Another honest mistake.  </p>
<p>3) There is a chance that cause and effect is reversed here.  That a woman can cook beautiful food MAKES her beautiful, as the happiest husbands know well.  Men I don&#8217;t know so much about.</p>
<p>4)  This post, all by itself, justifies the existence of the blogosphere.  Thank you Felix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
