<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Baker-Samwick finally getting traction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/is-baker-samwick-finally-getting-traction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/is-baker-samwick-finally-getting-traction/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ_Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/is-baker-samwick-finally-getting-traction/comment-page-1/#comment-4168</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ_Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/is-baker-samwick-finally-getting-traction/#comment-4168</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s perfect!  The government will own our houses, build our cars, and (soon) employ us all.  Utopia is just around the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s perfect!  The government will own our houses, build our cars, and (soon) employ us all.  Utopia is just around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdbd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/is-baker-samwick-finally-getting-traction/comment-page-1/#comment-4164</link>
		<dc:creator>bdbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/is-baker-samwick-finally-getting-traction/#comment-4164</guid>
		<description>Sensible just as a route around lots of transactions costs, if it makes sense for the parties involved, although I can&#039;t help thinking of the Fed as the &quot;landlord of last resort.&quot;  &quot;rent to own&quot; made sense, why not &quot;own to rent?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensible just as a route around lots of transactions costs, if it makes sense for the parties involved, although I can&#8217;t help thinking of the Fed as the &#8220;landlord of last resort.&#8221;  &#8220;rent to own&#8221; made sense, why not &#8220;own to rent?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
