<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday links get lost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-4196</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/#comment-4196</guid>
		<description>Why in the world, websites (or folks behind them) decide to use gray letters instead of black letters on a white background, in the name of brand identity? It strains the eye and makes reading those web pages a tedious chore. I am referring to the  CIA World Factbook  and many others like that. This trend is not old, but a recent (as in the last 3-4 years) phenomemon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why in the world, websites (or folks behind them) decide to use gray letters instead of black letters on a white background, in the name of brand identity? It strains the eye and makes reading those web pages a tedious chore. I am referring to the  CIA World Factbook  and many others like that. This trend is not old, but a recent (as in the last 3-4 years) phenomemon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-4166</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/#comment-4166</guid>
		<description>@Dave - yeah, it looks pretty, but as a frequent user of the factbook, like i bet felix is, i have to agree with him. the old design might have looked kind of crummy but (a) it loaded really quickly, (b) words were immediately search-able and not hidden underneath category tabs, and (c) it feels like it&#039;s got less information for some reason. i clicked on a few tabs for aruba, and it seemed pretty empty. probably because so much is under just one or two tabs (people and economy).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave &#8211; yeah, it looks pretty, but as a frequent user of the factbook, like i bet felix is, i have to agree with him. the old design might have looked kind of crummy but (a) it loaded really quickly, (b) words were immediately search-able and not hidden underneath category tabs, and (c) it feels like it&#8217;s got less information for some reason. i clicked on a few tabs for aruba, and it seemed pretty empty. probably because so much is under just one or two tabs (people and economy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-4129</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/#comment-4129</guid>
		<description>On a very cursory review, the CIA world fact book&#039;s redesign is quite impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a very cursory review, the CIA world fact book&#8217;s redesign is quite impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-4115</link>
		<dc:creator>flo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/monday-links-get-lost/#comment-4115</guid>
		<description>sharing stuff via bluetooth (not just music, also funny videos or photos, contacts, whatever) is really practical, because so many phones support it. Just out of luck if you have an iphone  (why, apple, why????) I did this all the time with my old phone, but just last weekend, someone wanted to share a photo with me, and ofc had to say it doesn&#039;t work with the iphone. Now I have to wait till maybe the get it on a pc and then send it :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sharing stuff via bluetooth (not just music, also funny videos or photos, contacts, whatever) is really practical, because so many phones support it. Just out of luck if you have an iphone  (why, apple, why????) I did this all the time with my old phone, but just last weekend, someone wanted to share a photo with me, and ofc had to say it doesn&#8217;t work with the iphone. Now I have to wait till maybe the get it on a pc and then send it :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
