<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday links work for peanuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/tuesday-links-work-for-peanuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/tuesday-links-work-for-peanuts/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/tuesday-links-work-for-peanuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/tuesday-links-work-for-peanuts/#comment-4192</guid>
		<description>Of course, there&#039;s nothing wrong with writing for glory rather than money.  I&#039;ve contributed probably a few thousand words to Wikipedia for zero dollars, and my Dad used to do software reviews for an old PC magazine for something like twenty bucks and a copy of the software.  If they&#039;d phrased the advert a bit differently, perhaps it wouldn&#039;t look so crass.  Then again...I&#039;m guessing they don&#039;t credit contributors, and their aim is to make money.  So, yeah, screw &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, there&#8217;s nothing wrong with writing for glory rather than money.  I&#8217;ve contributed probably a few thousand words to Wikipedia for zero dollars, and my Dad used to do software reviews for an old PC magazine for something like twenty bucks and a copy of the software.  If they&#8217;d phrased the advert a bit differently, perhaps it wouldn&#8217;t look so crass.  Then again&#8230;I&#8217;m guessing they don&#8217;t credit contributors, and their aim is to make money.  So, yeah, screw &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/tuesday-links-work-for-peanuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4191</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/tuesday-links-work-for-peanuts/#comment-4191</guid>
		<description>$10 for 600 words? There are people out there offering (and getting pieces delivered ofr) a lot less than that. $1 for 300 I&#039;ve seen.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$10 for 600 words? There are people out there offering (and getting pieces delivered ofr) a lot less than that. $1 for 300 I&#8217;ve seen&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don the libertarian Democrat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/tuesday-links-work-for-peanuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4180</link>
		<dc:creator>Don the libertarian Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/14/tuesday-links-work-for-peanuts/#comment-4180</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you pay someone then you should like his answers to questions about this. Keep in mind no one can be correct every time but I think someone willing to make the effort to protect your assets and who can explain it easily to you is probably a keeper.&quot;

I agree with this. You should follow the plan that you can understand. 

&quot;but not always” — that’s just saying it’s certain to fail.&quot;

Are you saying that someone or some theory can be correct all of the time where investing is concerned? If it isn&#039;t, chuck it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you pay someone then you should like his answers to questions about this. Keep in mind no one can be correct every time but I think someone willing to make the effort to protect your assets and who can explain it easily to you is probably a keeper.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with this. You should follow the plan that you can understand. </p>
<p>&#8220;but not always” — that’s just saying it’s certain to fail.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you saying that someone or some theory can be correct all of the time where investing is concerned? If it isn&#8217;t, chuck it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
