<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gawker Media profits soar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/27/gawker-media-profits-soar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/27/gawker-media-profits-soar/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/27/gawker-media-profits-soar/comment-page-1/#comment-4907</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/27/gawker-media-profits-soar/#comment-4907</guid>
		<description>If Gawker Media doesn&#039;t do something to fix their recent but continuously wretched server slowdown soon, these alleged figures are going to plummet. People are not going to put up with page-load waits similar to what we had to go through back in the 14400 modem days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Gawker Media doesn&#8217;t do something to fix their recent but continuously wretched server slowdown soon, these alleged figures are going to plummet. People are not going to put up with page-load waits similar to what we had to go through back in the 14400 modem days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/27/gawker-media-profits-soar/comment-page-1/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/27/gawker-media-profits-soar/#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but until we see a single real number (even just top line figure), this is all PR bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but until we see a single real number (even just top line figure), this is all PR bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Huff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/27/gawker-media-profits-soar/comment-page-1/#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Huff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/27/gawker-media-profits-soar/#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;re a ways off from a blog IPO - there&#039;s still too many people asking if you can make money blogging.

A sell off could very well be in the works though, and that&#039;s a good thing for the industry as a whole.  Gawker has shown the old guard media what direction media needs to be going, and how to make money doing it - though it&#039;s probably a lot less money for now.

It is debatable though - there may not be less money there, just less money for one organization.  Less consolidation, more niche content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;re a ways off from a blog IPO &#8211; there&#8217;s still too many people asking if you can make money blogging.</p>
<p>A sell off could very well be in the works though, and that&#8217;s a good thing for the industry as a whole.  Gawker has shown the old guard media what direction media needs to be going, and how to make money doing it &#8211; though it&#8217;s probably a lot less money for now.</p>
<p>It is debatable though &#8211; there may not be less money there, just less money for one organization.  Less consolidation, more niche content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
