Opinion

Felix Salmon

How art is like houses

By Felix Salmon
August 3, 2009

If the price of art falls, that means that now is the time to buy. This is the kind of rhetoric we’ve been hearing from real-estate professionals for a while now, repurposed by their counterparts in the art world:

Prices of works by artists born after 1945 have fallen nearly a third since a late-2007 peak, according to widely used market data compiler Artprice, and analysts say this could be a great time to get in.

Remember too that if the price of art rises, that also means that now is the time to buy:

The odd high-profile sale has underlined the category’s potential: a David Hockney portrait of Betty Freeman sold for $8 million in May, a world record for the artist — and still tipped as a sound investment.

“Whoever bought that work got an absolute total bargain,” said Simon de Pury, chairman of auction house Phillips de Pury & Company, who believes Hockney’s works will follow the pattern set by fellow British painter Francis Bacon, whose prices rocketed after an initial struggle.

Of course, Hockney was born in 1937, which means that technically he doesn’t fall into the “born after 1945″ category, but I’m sure no one really cares about that — the important thing is to buy! Now!

In reality, art — especially contemporary art — is never “a sound investment”. There are some driven collectors who buy it because they can’t help themselves; there are also some very succesful dealers who are extremely good at moving inventory and driving prices upwards. There’s even a tiny number of artists who saw their prices fall, only to then participate in a rebound during the 2000s art boom. But in general, once prices for a given artist start falling, they never recover. And the overwhelming majority of paintings by artists born after 1945 can’t be sold for any sum, let alone anything approaching the initial amount paid for them.

I have a rule of thumb for both paintings and houses: would you buy it at this price today if you knew that you could only ever sell it for $1 in the future? If the answer is yes, then go ahead and buy. If it’s no, then think very hard indeed before buying.

Houses don’t generally go to zero, of course — not outside Detroit, anyway. But the thought experiment is still worth running, because it helps to crystallize the degree to which you’re implicitly speculating on the housing market when you buy a home.

If it’s cheaper to buy than to rent, it doesn’t matter if the value of the house goes to zero — you’re still better off buying. Alternatively, if you love a particular property and very much want to own it, and you’re willing to pay a lot of money to do so, that’s fine too. (That’s the main reason why people should buy art.) But if you’re buying as an investment, in the hope that your property will rise in value, it might be worth taking another look at your risk profile. Maybe you can afford to take that kind of risk. But then again, maybe you can’t.

Comments
2 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

this article seems to be saying what i have been saying for some time.. the fact that art needs to portray in an understandable way the glory or the hell but the undeniable charictar and spirit and truth, …. truth.. truth, of existence when the art is actually produced. Art is not meant to be so much about the artist as the artist ability to capture the spirit of the moment in time in a way that will touch people in a different place in a different time and be understood or provoke and emotion or memory that can be shared through time… there is a lot 2 be said for being as compact and brief as possible but… the charlatans, and the fake artists or bullexcrementers and the minimalist with no , meaning, no purpose, no message..no relevance will have no place in the future therefore no value.. i think you are quite correct

Posted by artistkvip | Report as abusive
 

Also, if you want art for your WALLS, eg, as a business, you can always rent!

http://www.sfmoma.org/view/page.landing/ artists_gallery_rentals_sales

is where the artwork is from where I work. As a bonus, it gets changed every few months.

Posted by Nicholas Weaver | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •