Comments on: Friday links change their mind http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Curmudgeon http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-5237 Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:38:04 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/#comment-5237 My sense was that the original WSJ story on government aircraft was generally accurate, but given a misleading title (reported well but with questionable editing). And given this morning’s follow-up, you have to have the belief that it was a story that needed to be told. Methinks Chittum prefers critizing media he disagrees with over government spending money it doesn’t have.

]]>
By: MarshalN http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-5215 Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:00:15 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/#comment-5215 How did I miss that post? Odd. Sorry :)

]]>
By: MarshalN http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-5214 Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:51:48 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/#comment-5214 Ben Stine got dumped by the NYT. I’m surprised you haven’t blogged about it yet.

]]>
By: Chinainterpreter http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-5201 Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:39:41 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/#comment-5201 sounds great

]]>
By: jonathan http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-5195 Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:01:16 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/07/friday-links-change-their-mind/#comment-5195 Lomborg did not change his mind. You know that, I hope. He argues for more incisive thought about global warming and the correct policy responses; he’s not in denial over its reality.

]]>