<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late links, September 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/03/late-links-september-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/03/late-links-september-2/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogma</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/03/late-links-september-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6296</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/03/late-links-september-2/#comment-6296</guid>
		<description>Should look before crossing the road, roads are for motor vehicles not bicycles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should look before crossing the road, roads are for motor vehicles not bicycles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winstongator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/03/late-links-september-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6267</link>
		<dc:creator>winstongator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/03/late-links-september-2/#comment-6267</guid>
		<description>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/26/education/26education.html?scp=8&amp;sq=%22self-regulation%22%20children%20sit&amp;st=cse
I think this is the article I remembered from teh Times on self-regulation.  It seemed to suggest that letting kids organize themselves and solve problems on their own - without adults - was what instilled self-regulation.  That would seem to counteract the ability to &#039;teach&#039; self-regulation.

Having good self-regulation skills makes you good at X, and also makes you good at sitting down and reading, and good at following directions. Teaching X does not equate to teaching self-regulation.  Someone who is good at logic is also good at crossword puzzles, so let&#039;s teach logic through crosswords!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/26/education/26education.html?scp=8&#038;sq=%22self-regulation%22%20children%20sit&#038;st=cse'>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/26/educat ion/26education.html?scp=8&#038;sq=%22self-re gulation%22%20children%20sit&#038;st=cse</a><br />
I think this is the article I remembered from teh Times on self-regulation.  It seemed to suggest that letting kids organize themselves and solve problems on their own &#8211; without adults &#8211; was what instilled self-regulation.  That would seem to counteract the ability to &#8216;teach&#8217; self-regulation.</p>
<p>Having good self-regulation skills makes you good at X, and also makes you good at sitting down and reading, and good at following directions. Teaching X does not equate to teaching self-regulation.  Someone who is good at logic is also good at crossword puzzles, so let&#8217;s teach logic through crosswords!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/03/late-links-september-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6260</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/03/late-links-september-2/#comment-6260</guid>
		<description>re: OK, so being good at Task X is a good predictor of academic success. But that doesn’t mean that we should teach Task X.

while you&#039;re right that the test is probably an indicator of some deeper intellectual action going on inside the kids&#039; heads, it&#039;s certainly worth studying whether just teaching kids to touch their toes when i say &#039;head&#039; makes them smarter. if anything, it will prepare these kindergartners for twelve more years of public education where they&#039;re taught to succeed on standardized tests alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: OK, so being good at Task X is a good predictor of academic success. But that doesn’t mean that we should teach Task X.</p>
<p>while you&#8217;re right that the test is probably an indicator of some deeper intellectual action going on inside the kids&#8217; heads, it&#8217;s certainly worth studying whether just teaching kids to touch their toes when i say &#8216;head&#8217; makes them smarter. if anything, it will prepare these kindergartners for twelve more years of public education where they&#8217;re taught to succeed on standardized tests alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
