Citi’s cities

By Felix Salmon
September 24, 2009
David Enrich says that Citi is retrenching its consumer operations in the US:

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

David Enrich says that Citi is retrenching its consumer operations in the US:

Executives at the New York company plan to narrow the focus of Citigroup’s U.S. branch network to six major metropolitan areas, according to people familiar with the situation. Citigroup also will limit its overall consumer lending in the U.S. primarily to credit cards and “jumbo” mortgages, while catering largely to affluent customers.

This makes a great deal of sense: even now Citigroup has many fewer branches than the likes of PNC and BB&T, and with the collapse of the ill-fated Wachovia acquisition, its dreams of becoming a retail powerhouse in the US are clearly dead. Citi was never very good at old-fashioned branch banking, and it should indeed play to its strengths rather than trying to be all things to all people.

Citi’s main strength, globally, is banking the affluent, largely through its extremely strong Citigold brand. The cities it’s concentrating on — New York, Washington, Miami, Chicago, San Francisco, and LA — are the main global cities in America, the ones that Citi’s international client base is most likely to visit. Philadelphia and Dallas, though lovely places, aren’t global in that sense, and if Citi has less than 1% of the deposit base in such cities anyway, it’s easy to see how it could make the decision to sell those branches to a strong local franchise. (It probably won’t, though: Citi sources tell my colleague Matt Goldstein that although the bank will indeed concentrate on the big six cities, it’s not going to leave Philly, Dallas, Houston, or Boston.)

I’m sure it’s unrelated to the WSJ story, but last night I got an email from the branch manager of my Citibank branch, the one at 120 Broadway in lower Manhattan; the subject line was “Our commitment to New York starts here.” She included her phone number, so I gave her a ring, and she gave me some astonishing numbers. That one branch alone, which includes all the accounts which used to be held at the World Trade Center branch, has over 30,000 customers, and a deposit base of — get this – over $1.5 billion. (That’s 75 times the size of my local credit union.) Its customers are a very diverse and international group of people, and, with an average of about $50,000 on deposit apiece, are clearly pretty well off.

That kind of customer base is clearly what Citi wants, and what it’s good at; you can see why Citi would want to concentrate on jumbo mortgages.

It’s true that this news means Citigroup pulling back from banking the ordinary Americans who bailed the bank out last fall. But frankly those ordinary Americans were always better served by the big retail powerhouses anyway. Retail banking is not Citi’s strength, except for possibly in Mexico and Poland. It should stick to banking the global affluent, who stuck by it through all the troubles of the past year, and who remain incredibly profitable for the bank.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

Does this mean it will still serve the suburbs of the those cities, or simply the cities themselves?

Posted by Brian J | Report as abusive

I think it was because of my comment yesterday. They are scared they are going to lose a thought leader. 09/09/23/bank-fees-around-the-world/#com ment-7072

Posted by zach | Report as abusive

They must’ve missed the opening for that newest local construction, $1+ billion Cowboys stadium. Yep, no big money in Dallas or Ft Worth.

Posted by Griff | Report as abusive

It’s weird saying this, but it just seems like to me that every time someone does one of this “we’re gonna bank every town in America” shticks what’s at work is not expansion of profits but rather sheer egotism. Like seriously, vanilla, run-of-the-mill retail banking with small potatoes is just not that profitable. And it’s a lot easier to mess up majorly (WaMu, Wachovia, etc.) than in premium, international banking.

I seriously don’t understand the mentality of people who want to have like 3000 branches in mainland U.S. It’s utterly stupid.

Posted by Myles SG | Report as abusive

The Dallas area only has the global headquarters of small companies like ExxonMobil and AT&T, and the US headquarters of insignificant global firms such as Ericsson, Nokia, RIM, EADS American Eurocopter, Alcon, etc. A rather provincial place.

Posted by Rich Republican | Report as abusive