Comments on: Counterparties http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Curmudgeon http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/comment-page-1/#comment-7384 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:36:37 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/#comment-7384 @TED: Thanks for the enlightenment. I still believe that someone in your industry could read what you wrote and excuse themselves as individual participants. Why else do we find such institutional resistance to change? I’ve not heard much about leadership standing up there and saying “Our system, model, and we as individuals bear a large amount of blame, and here’s how we plan to change.” Have you heard such proclamations from financial services leadership? I understand that there may be legal implications to such a statement, but 1) they should be secondary to honesty; and 2) they do not preclude change. Have you seen real change?

Good for you on the soul searching. I am not of any industry associated with finance, so consider my opinions as those of an educated outsider. In my own profession and life, I search my soul far too often, and far too often find it wanting.

]]>
By: zach http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/comment-page-1/#comment-7381 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:28:33 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/#comment-7381 I renew my call for some sort of disambiguation device between The ED and TED (Tech, Esomething, Dsomething).

]]>
By: The Epicurean Dealmaker http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/comment-page-1/#comment-7351 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:50:18 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/#comment-7351 @Curmudgeon — Actually, I think you have rather spectacularly missed my entire point. My point was to explain what I perceive to have been the contributing factors, context, and behaviors in the investment banking industry which helped lead to and exacerbate the recent crisis. I did this in the context of arguing against what I see as the distressingly prevalent tendency of many to simplistically ascribe the failures of my industry to compensation models.

I do not deny the flaws and failures of my industry. I find it hard to believe anyone could read what I wrote and think that. Far from denying the necessity of soul searching, my post comprises one of the most honest self-examinations of an important set of participants in the global financial markets I am aware of. However, I continue to reject the disingenuous and downright dishonest tendencies of many other parties whose mistakes and greed contributed to our problems to assign all the blame to “greedy” investment bankers.

I have indeed searched my soul, Sir. Many of my peers have, too. Have you?

]]>
By: Curmudgeon http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/comment-page-1/#comment-7348 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:13:00 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/30/counterparties-12/#comment-7348 Once again, I object to TED’s, um, insights. He (for the sake of simplicity, I am assuming TED is a he) has explained everything and nothing.

Worse, he has provided cover for every investment banker who once had skin in the game to look in the mirror and say, “What I did was right. It was the other guys. I just got caught up in the tsunami.” This is wrong. There has to be both individual and institutional soul-searching to begin the process of fixing, but TED says no.

]]>