<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Derivatives datapoint of the day, OCC statistics edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/06/derivatives-datapoint-of-the-day-occ-statistics-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/06/derivatives-datapoint-of-the-day-occ-statistics-edition/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/06/derivatives-datapoint-of-the-day-occ-statistics-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-7646</link>
		<dc:creator>jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/06/derivatives-datapoint-of-the-day-occ-statistics-edition/#comment-7646</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why does the OCC make the rather legalistic distinction between commercial banks and holding companies, and then concentrate on the former rather than the latter?&quot;
The OCC regulates *banks*, not bank holding companies and therefore has the power to force *banks* (not bank holding companies) to file so-called &quot;call reports&quot; in order to compile their derivatives exposure. 
Table 1 is based in these call reports and table 2 is not (read the notes). 
Normally there is very little difference between the 2 tables but as you may be aware, we have some new BHCs plus the structure of some of the old ones has been changed, so the current difference between table 1 and 2 is a temporary anomaly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why does the OCC make the rather legalistic distinction between commercial banks and holding companies, and then concentrate on the former rather than the latter?&#8221;<br />
The OCC regulates *banks*, not bank holding companies and therefore has the power to force *banks* (not bank holding companies) to file so-called &#8220;call reports&#8221; in order to compile their derivatives exposure.<br />
Table 1 is based in these call reports and table 2 is not (read the notes).<br />
Normally there is very little difference between the 2 tables but as you may be aware, we have some new BHCs plus the structure of some of the old ones has been changed, so the current difference between table 1 and 2 is a temporary anomaly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
