Let’s cut Ken Lewis’s payout

By Felix Salmon
October 8, 2009
the government is in a similar situation:

A Bank of America spokesman disputed both the SEIU's figures - noting the bank received only $45 billion in public assistance.

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

Millions of Americans know that Bank of America doesn’t care about numbers in the hundreds or thousands of dollars. It seems the government is in a similar situation:

A Bank of America spokesman disputed both the SEIU’s figures – noting the bank received only $45 billion in public assistance.

Yeah, a mere $45 billion. When the numbers are so microscopic, why should anybody pay attention to $126 million (more or less: after all, these values are all of negligible consequence) which is due to be trousered by Ken Lewis upon his departure?

As for me, I like the idea of Kenneth Feinberg cracking down on Lewis’s payout. BofA isn’t paying for performance, and it’s not like the bank needs has any worries about Lewis disappearing off to a higher-paying rival. The bank’s hilarious attempts to downplay the scale of BofA’s bailout — and of Lewis’s package — only prove how easy this decision really is.

More From Felix Salmon
Post Felix
The Piketty pessimist
The most expensive lottery ticket in the world
The problems of HFT, Joe Stiglitz edition
Private equity math, Nuveen edition
Five explanations for Greece’s bond yield
Comments
2 comments so far

only $45 billion—it really seems to be a total ‘attitude’ of financial firms over here –in the good ol’ u.s.a.—screaming about any regulation will make it so hard for ‘innovation’–yet, their innovation is why we’re here in the first place! i read yesterday that hsbc thinks the banks should apologize to the world for getting all of us into all this trouble–i was shocked! so for ken lewis to ‘earn’ $126 million–sure that’s small compared to $45 billion, but since bofa is still standing, how about he keeps $10 million and shares the remainder with food banks in every state to help people that have gone bust???

Posted by f. l. smith | Report as abusive

Absolutely right, Felix.

No other $45B turnaround investor would allow this payment. None in the whole gdamn world, with the exception of Russia for a personal friend of Vladimir.

Ken Lewis failed. $10M for failure is more than enough. To restore capitalism, we need to establish that you get rich for succeeding, and only for succeeding. Period.

Posted by Dollared | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/