<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counterparties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Teicher @Aerocles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/comment-page-1/#comment-7756</link>
		<dc:creator>David Teicher @Aerocles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/#comment-7756</guid>
		<description>I actually just posted a poll asking people Did Obama Really Deserve To Win The Nobel Peace Prize? Most Have Said No So Far...
http://aerocles.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/did-obama-deserve-the-nobel-prize-do-you-retweet-links-before-clicking-them/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually just posted a poll asking people Did Obama Really Deserve To Win The Nobel Peace Prize? Most Have Said No So Far&#8230;<br />
<a href='http://aerocles.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/did-obama-deserve-the-nobel-prize-do-you-retweet-links-before-clicking-them/'>http://aerocles.wordpress.com/2009/10/09 &nbsp;/did-obama-deserve-the-nobel-prize-do-y ou-retweet-links-before-clicking-them/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/comment-page-1/#comment-7755</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/#comment-7755</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t work in insurance, but I appreciate your distinction between propitious selection describing buyers&#039; behavior and &quot;skimming the cream&quot; describing the behavior of insurers seeking to capitalize thereon.

On a side note, I&#039;d be curious to learn how much adverse/propitious selection influences insurance marketing strategies.  E.g. Do auto insurers advertise higher rates in places like auto body shops, MTV, NASCAR, and AARP Magazine; and lower rates in places like, say, Parenting Magazine or in close proximity to wherever MADD holds their meetings?  Is this a novel idea or are the decision makers already keenly aware of these things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t work in insurance, but I appreciate your distinction between propitious selection describing buyers&#8217; behavior and &#8220;skimming the cream&#8221; describing the behavior of insurers seeking to capitalize thereon.</p>
<p>On a side note, I&#8217;d be curious to learn how much adverse/propitious selection influences insurance marketing strategies.  E.g. Do auto insurers advertise higher rates in places like auto body shops, MTV, NASCAR, and AARP Magazine; and lower rates in places like, say, Parenting Magazine or in close proximity to wherever MADD holds their meetings?  Is this a novel idea or are the decision makers already keenly aware of these things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Drytellar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/comment-page-1/#comment-7752</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Drytellar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/#comment-7752</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great term, Sandrew. I work in insurance though I hadn&#039;t heard it. From look it up it does seem to be more the opposite of adverse selection. Instead of high risks being more likely to buy insurance, with &quot;propitious selection&quot; it seems like low risks are more likely to purchase. &#039;Skimming the cream&#039;, as I understand it, refers the insurance company&#039;s own efforts to identify low risks. Is that how you understand the distinction? Of course, I&#039;m sure the boundaries between the two terms is fairly blurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great term, Sandrew. I work in insurance though I hadn&#8217;t heard it. From look it up it does seem to be more the opposite of adverse selection. Instead of high risks being more likely to buy insurance, with &#8220;propitious selection&#8221; it seems like low risks are more likely to purchase. &#8216;Skimming the cream&#8217;, as I understand it, refers the insurance company&#8217;s own efforts to identify low risks. Is that how you understand the distinction? Of course, I&#8217;m sure the boundaries between the two terms is fairly blurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/comment-page-1/#comment-7750</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/#comment-7750</guid>
		<description>I prefer the term propitious selection myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the term propitious selection myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Drytellar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/comment-page-1/#comment-7748</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Drytellar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/09/counterparties-18/#comment-7748</guid>
		<description>For the record, in the insurance industry the opposite of adverse selection is &quot;skimming the cream.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, in the insurance industry the opposite of adverse selection is &#8220;skimming the cream.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
