<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kenneth Feinberg, pay warrior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Huss</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8259</link>
		<dc:creator>John Huss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8259</guid>
		<description>It bears to keep this in mind:

Without gov&#039;t money, these companies would have gone belly up. Had that happened, the compensation would have received would have been $0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It bears to keep this in mind:</p>
<p>Without gov&#8217;t money, these companies would have gone belly up. Had that happened, the compensation would have received would have been $0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8194</link>
		<dc:creator>DW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8194</guid>
		<description>so, if they quit, do the people that take their place also get the same pay?

Is it possible for nobody to take that job and for some subordinate position to start taking on that responsibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, if they quit, do the people that take their place also get the same pay?</p>
<p>Is it possible for nobody to take that job and for some subordinate position to start taking on that responsibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8185</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8185</guid>
		<description>&quot;What this means is that the people who used to be the 25 best-paid employees are now going to be far down the list, with underlings making much more than they do. &quot;

I am betting that suddenly execs won&#039;t want to pay their underlings so much anymore, bringing about big wage deflation to the entire organization.

They will want very badly to repay TARP.  If under this burden, a bank still does not repay TARP it must be in horrible shape.

So many banks have avoided realizing their losses by just refusing to deal with borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages a long time ago.  They are gradually becoming insolvent as more borrowers go delinquent, but they are not realizing these losses.  They are doing nothing, because any action on the loan will force a write-down.  That makes the profit of the present entirely fictitious, exceeded by unrealized losses which are mounting.

It is appropriate that they are earning much less.  Every penny they earn falls in the category of what Galbraith called the &#039;bezzle&#039; since the insolvency of these banks is not appreciated yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What this means is that the people who used to be the 25 best-paid employees are now going to be far down the list, with underlings making much more than they do. &#8221;</p>
<p>I am betting that suddenly execs won&#8217;t want to pay their underlings so much anymore, bringing about big wage deflation to the entire organization.</p>
<p>They will want very badly to repay TARP.  If under this burden, a bank still does not repay TARP it must be in horrible shape.</p>
<p>So many banks have avoided realizing their losses by just refusing to deal with borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages a long time ago.  They are gradually becoming insolvent as more borrowers go delinquent, but they are not realizing these losses.  They are doing nothing, because any action on the loan will force a write-down.  That makes the profit of the present entirely fictitious, exceeded by unrealized losses which are mounting.</p>
<p>It is appropriate that they are earning much less.  Every penny they earn falls in the category of what Galbraith called the &#8216;bezzle&#8217; since the insolvency of these banks is not appreciated yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8184</link>
		<dc:creator>right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8184</guid>
		<description>You still don&#039;t understand that &quot;rich&quot; is a measure of wealth, not income.  Someone who starts with little and earns $200K a year, every year of his or her life, is simply not rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You still don&#8217;t understand that &#8220;rich&#8221; is a measure of wealth, not income.  Someone who starts with little and earns $200K a year, every year of his or her life, is simply not rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew G. Saroff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8179</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew G. Saroff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8179</guid>
		<description>Seriously, this is theater.  The execs will still find a way to be overpaid, something like....I don&#039;t know....Dividends on special preferred the stock that they cannot sell yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, this is theater.  The execs will still find a way to be overpaid, something like&#8230;.I don&#8217;t know&#8230;.Dividends on special preferred the stock that they cannot sell yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KenG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8178</link>
		<dc:creator>KenG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8178</guid>
		<description>&quot;At the financial products division of A.I.G., the locus of problems that plagued the large insurer and forced its rescue with more than $180 billion in taxpayer assistance&quot;

AIG didn&#039;t get $180B in taxpayer assistance, their counterparties (like Goldman) did.  The shareholders of AIG were forced to accept this deal, with the government paying off their creditors in exchange for 80% ownership.  If the government didn&#039;t pay off those claims, the counterparties would have had to negotiate with AIG, and would most likely have ended up with less than they recevied from the government, and AIG shareholders would have retained more equity in their company.

Now the people working at the divisions that remain with AIG are effectively government employees, and probably shouldn&#039;t get any bonuses, because the government only gives out medals to employees who screw up, not bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;At the financial products division of A.I.G., the locus of problems that plagued the large insurer and forced its rescue with more than $180 billion in taxpayer assistance&#8221;</p>
<p>AIG didn&#8217;t get $180B in taxpayer assistance, their counterparties (like Goldman) did.  The shareholders of AIG were forced to accept this deal, with the government paying off their creditors in exchange for 80% ownership.  If the government didn&#8217;t pay off those claims, the counterparties would have had to negotiate with AIG, and would most likely have ended up with less than they recevied from the government, and AIG shareholders would have retained more equity in their company.</p>
<p>Now the people working at the divisions that remain with AIG are effectively government employees, and probably shouldn&#8217;t get any bonuses, because the government only gives out medals to employees who screw up, not bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8166</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8166</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t the executives quit in droves after this?  Why are they going to hang in &quot;through this fallow period&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t the executives quit in droves after this?  Why are they going to hang in &#8220;through this fallow period&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP4</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8165</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8165</guid>
		<description>* A Nation of No Losers *

We do not let you be a loser!
Your mistakes will be rewarded handsomely.

When you bought a clunker that you should not have, we give you $4,500.
When you bought a mansion that you cannot afford, we&#039;re going to bail you out.
When you bought any inefficient appliance or anything, we&#039;ll pay you no matter how old they are.

When you lost your job, we extend your benefit.

When you do not have saving, we give you free health care.
When you have saving or a job, we take away your health care.

Teenagers, the more babies you have, the more benefits you have.
Drunk drivers, no one will prosecute you as the entire jury and even the judge are drunk.
Old ladies, your driver&#039;s license is also a license to kill.
Black kids, special pass to go to college and jobs.
Prisoners, you will get the flu shots first and free dental care.
Fatsos, do not worry as our up-coming drugs will melt all your fat while you sleep.


All athletes are rewarded with millions for taking drugs.
We voice loudly and disapprovingly on foreign athletes doing same.
It is an America invention!

When you cheated billions, you can retire in a resort-like &#039;prison&#039;.
Also, the billions your wife hid is hers - no questions asked.

No other developed country lets their citizens own guns.
NRA and his puppet politicians will give you millions of funny &#039;reasons&#039;.

When your company fails, we bail it out.
The executives are rewarded with bailout money for bringing down a company.

You die penniless, we give you $500.
You die with millions, we share your wealth.

The small catch.
We need you to re-elect us in 4 years.

The children cannot vote today, so let&#039;s pass our debts to them.
China does not have a voice here, so let&#039;s pass all the blames to them.

Even the entire world agree with us.
Our president is awarded the Nobel prize for doing nothing for peace, so why you need to work hard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* A Nation of No Losers *</p>
<p>We do not let you be a loser!<br />
Your mistakes will be rewarded handsomely.</p>
<p>When you bought a clunker that you should not have, we give you $4,500.<br />
When you bought a mansion that you cannot afford, we&#8217;re going to bail you out.<br />
When you bought any inefficient appliance or anything, we&#8217;ll pay you no matter how old they are.</p>
<p>When you lost your job, we extend your benefit.</p>
<p>When you do not have saving, we give you free health care.<br />
When you have saving or a job, we take away your health care.</p>
<p>Teenagers, the more babies you have, the more benefits you have.<br />
Drunk drivers, no one will prosecute you as the entire jury and even the judge are drunk.<br />
Old ladies, your driver&#8217;s license is also a license to kill.<br />
Black kids, special pass to go to college and jobs.<br />
Prisoners, you will get the flu shots first and free dental care.<br />
Fatsos, do not worry as our up-coming drugs will melt all your fat while you sleep.</p>
<p>All athletes are rewarded with millions for taking drugs.<br />
We voice loudly and disapprovingly on foreign athletes doing same.<br />
It is an America invention!</p>
<p>When you cheated billions, you can retire in a resort-like &#8216;prison&#8217;.<br />
Also, the billions your wife hid is hers &#8211; no questions asked.</p>
<p>No other developed country lets their citizens own guns.<br />
NRA and his puppet politicians will give you millions of funny &#8216;reasons&#8217;.</p>
<p>When your company fails, we bail it out.<br />
The executives are rewarded with bailout money for bringing down a company.</p>
<p>You die penniless, we give you $500.<br />
You die with millions, we share your wealth.</p>
<p>The small catch.<br />
We need you to re-elect us in 4 years.</p>
<p>The children cannot vote today, so let&#8217;s pass our debts to them.<br />
China does not have a voice here, so let&#8217;s pass all the blames to them.</p>
<p>Even the entire world agree with us.<br />
Our president is awarded the Nobel prize for doing nothing for peace, so why you need to work hard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peatey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8161</link>
		<dc:creator>peatey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8161</guid>
		<description>Pat Lyons, see the word &quot;This&quot; in the second sentence of the original post?  Put your mouse over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Lyons, see the word &#8220;This&#8221; in the second sentence of the original post?  Put your mouse over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8159</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8159</guid>
		<description>Well this certainly works out wonderfully for Goldman Sachs, not doesn&#039;t it?  They continue to make money hand over fist in a consolidated industry, meanwhile their competition is castrated.  The competition has severe pay limits, while Goldman can hire whoever they want with lavish pay packages.  

The Goldman takeover is nearing completion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this certainly works out wonderfully for Goldman Sachs, not doesn&#8217;t it?  They continue to make money hand over fist in a consolidated industry, meanwhile their competition is castrated.  The competition has severe pay limits, while Goldman can hire whoever they want with lavish pay packages.  </p>
<p>The Goldman takeover is nearing completion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unsympathetic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8153</link>
		<dc:creator>Unsympathetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8153</guid>
		<description>This is NOT more aggressive than anyone hoped it would be.

JPM, Goldman, and ALL banks receiving AIG/TARP money need to be included.

This is farce masquerading as force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is NOT more aggressive than anyone hoped it would be.</p>
<p>JPM, Goldman, and ALL banks receiving AIG/TARP money need to be included.</p>
<p>This is farce masquerading as force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Lyons</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8151</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8151</guid>
		<description>How about citing and linking to your source for that big, news-packed block quotation: A scoop by Steven Labaton in The New York Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about citing and linking to your source for that big, news-packed block quotation: A scoop by Steven Labaton in The New York Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-8150</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/10/21/kenneth-feinberg-pay-warrior/#comment-8150</guid>
		<description>I must be lacking an allele for the populism gene, because how much executives get really doesn&#039;t concern me all that much. The structure of compensation packages and incentives is a concern, but the magnitudes themselves don’t put me in a wall-punching mood. Sure, if you effectively work for the PTB, you should expect to sing their tune, but high-rollers&#039; pay is pretty much noise compared to wealth theft through government redistribution (largely downward), profligacy and outright waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be lacking an allele for the populism gene, because how much executives get really doesn&#8217;t concern me all that much. The structure of compensation packages and incentives is a concern, but the magnitudes themselves don’t put me in a wall-punching mood. Sure, if you effectively work for the PTB, you should expect to sing their tune, but high-rollers&#8217; pay is pretty much noise compared to wealth theft through government redistribution (largely downward), profligacy and outright waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
