Counterparties

By Felix Salmon
November 6, 2009
American Banker

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

Artful in the extreme: Dave Eggers publishing house does a newspaper — McSweeney’s

Cracking down on would-be pretzel monopolists — WSJ

The right way to eat sushi. Don’t dip it rice-side-down into the soy sauce! — Snippets

Tkacik on Gladwell. Warning: 7,719 words! — The Nation

Want to kill bankers? There’s an app for that — American Banker

The curveball illusion — Illusion Contest

Japanese bike-parking technology — Guardian

Pandit didn’t work at Citi. Thain didn’t work at Merrill. Corzine wouldn’t work at BofA — The Deal

Jon Chait fact-checks error-riddled WSJ op-ed piece. Don’t hold your breath waiting for correction — TNR

“Mono-urbanity is so 20th century.” — Hyperallergic

Is BlackBerry the new AOL? If it can’t beef up its web browser sharpish, then yes — WSJ

Even if you’re paying the WSJ $600 a year, you still can’t get stories more than 2 years old. Yikes. — Newsbreaks

Block-by-block election results in NYC — NYT

Performance reviews actually damage the receiver’s performance, by underlining the alpha status of the giver — Reuters

Fortune to cut 30% of its editorial staff. And, one hopes, Ben Stein — NYP

Might BofA move its HQ to NYC? Makes sense to me, it has the city’s second-tallest building — Crain’s

More From Felix Salmon
Post Felix
The Piketty pessimist
The most expensive lottery ticket in the world
The problems of HFT, Joe Stiglitz edition
Private equity math, Nuveen edition
Five explanations for Greece’s bond yield
Comments
3 comments so far

Well, I read about two-thirds of the piece on Gladwell. I’m pretty sure he’s saying Gladwell is a bullshitter. Just so.

Gladwell wrote the introduction for a new and overly ambitious book about basketaball by Bill Simmons, another bullshitter.

Posted by middyfeek | Report as abusive

Brilliant Paper!

BANKING ON THE STATE
Piergiorgio Alessandri
&
Andrew G Haldane*
Bank of England
November 2009

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publicati ons/speeches/2009/speech409.pdf

‘Performance reviews actually damage the receiver’s performance, by underlining the alpha status of the giver”:- is that why we behave like 1980′s monkeys before Xmas bonuses, which this year might be peanuts ?

Posted by Casper | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/