Comments on: The too-big-to-fail debate continues http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/13/the-too-big-to-fail-debate-continues/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Pete http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/13/the-too-big-to-fail-debate-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-8806 Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:01:34 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/13/the-too-big-to-fail-debate-continues/#comment-8806 I think you’re missing his point. You’re actually agreeing with EoC. He isn’t saying that the biggest banks MADE the biggest investment in risk management systems, he’s saying they NEEDED to, and the ones that did have done best.

]]>
By: acuvue oasys http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/13/the-too-big-to-fail-debate-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-8734 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:09:03 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/13/the-too-big-to-fail-debate-continues/#comment-8734 Very nicely written Felix, it’d about time someone told it as it is about the banks.

“in fact, bigger banks tend to have more places in which they can hide nuclear waste from senior management and the board”

Absolutely spot on!

]]>