<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counterparties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/25/counterparties-43/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/25/counterparties-43/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/25/counterparties-43/comment-page-1/#comment-9196</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/25/counterparties-43/#comment-9196</guid>
		<description>Dobbs&#039; statements about the number of illegal immigrants in the US are correct. If anything, he&#039;s underestimating. It&#039;s much, much higher than the miraculously unchanging &quot;12 million&quot; figure, which was reached back in the early 80&#039;s. (My 1980 edition of the Guinness Book of World Records gives a figure of 10 million in the year of its publication.)The arguments for the accepted figure pretty much all boil down to &quot;everyone responsible is quoting it, so it must be true.&quot; Yeah, I read it in the papers and saw it on TV, so there it is. Absolute stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dobbs&#8217; statements about the number of illegal immigrants in the US are correct. If anything, he&#8217;s underestimating. It&#8217;s much, much higher than the miraculously unchanging &#8220;12 million&#8221; figure, which was reached back in the early 80&#8242;s. (My 1980 edition of the Guinness Book of World Records gives a figure of 10 million in the year of its publication.)The arguments for the accepted figure pretty much all boil down to &#8220;everyone responsible is quoting it, so it must be true.&#8221; Yeah, I read it in the papers and saw it on TV, so there it is. Absolute stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jansen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/25/counterparties-43/comment-page-1/#comment-9181</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/25/counterparties-43/#comment-9181</guid>
		<description>Felix,Thank you very much for all of your kind words and for your support at the beginning.JJJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix,Thank you very much for all of your kind words and for your support at the beginning.JJJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
